Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 3;339:b3292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3292

Table 2.

  Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for associations between thigh circumference and total mortality for 1436 men aged 35-65 followed for 12.5 years

Centile of thigh circumference (cm) Model 1* Model 2† Model 3‡ Model 4¶
2.5 (46.5) 1.59 (1.11 to 2.28) 2.62 (1.83 to 3.76) 2.53 (1.74 to 3.69) 2.23 (1.47 to 3.39)
5 (48.0) 1.38 (1.05 to 1.82) 2.14 (1.63 to 2.81) 2.11 (1.54 to 2.89) 1.90 (1.35 to 2.67)
10 (49.5) 1.21 (0.98 to 1.50) 1.75 (1.42 to 2.17) 1.76 (1.34 to 2.32) 1.61 (1.21 to 2.15)
25 (52.0) 1.02 (0.86 to 1.21) 1.30 (1.09 to 1.53) 1.32 (1.07 to 1.64) 1.26 (1.01 to 1.57)
50 (55.0) 1 1 1 1
75 (58.0) 1.09 (0.91 to 1.29) 0.84 (0.71 to 1.00) 0.81 (0.66 to 1.01) 0.83 (0.67 to 1.04)
90 (61.0) 1.14 (0.86 to 1.51) 0.73 (0.55 to 0.97) 0.70 (0.48 to 1.03) 0.70 (0.46 to 1.06)
95 (63.0) 1.16 (0.75 to 1.79) 0.67 (0.43 to 1.03) 0.64 (0.36 to 1.14) 0.62 (0.33 to 1.16)
97.5 (64.0) 1.17 (0.69 to 1.98) 0.64 (0.38 to 1.08) 0.62 (0.31 to 1.23) 0.58 (0.28 to 1.24)

*Adjusted for smoking, physical activity, and education.

†Additionally to * adjusted for body fat percentage and body height. P<0.001, likelihood ratio test for effect.

‡Additionally to * adjusted for BMI (body mass index) and waist circumference. P<0.001, likelihood ratio test for effect.

¶Additionally to ‡ adjusted for alcohol, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. P<0.01, likelihood ratio test for effect.