Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 3;339:b3292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3292

Table 4.

  Figures are hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for associations between thigh circumference and cardiovascular disease from 1436 men aged 35-65 followed for 10 years

Centile of thigh circumference (cm) Model 1* Model 2† Model 3‡ Model 4¶
2.5 (46.5) 1.25 (0.85 to 1.85) 1.98 (1.34 to 2.92) 2.30 (1.62 to 3.26) 2.03 (1.35 to 3.03)
5 (48.0) 1.14 (0.85 to 1.52) 1.70 (1.27 to 2.27) 1.96 (1.46 to 2.63) 1.73 (1.25 to 2.41)
10 (49.5) 1.04 (0.84 to 1.28) 1.47 (1.19 to 1.82) 1.67 (1.29 to 2.16) 1.49 (1.13 to 1.96)
25 (52.0) 0.94 (0.80 to 1.10) 1.18 (1.01 to 1.38) 1.30 (1.06 to 1.59) 1.19 (0.96 to 1.46)
50 (55.0) 1 1 1 1
75 (58.0) 1.19 (1.00 to 1.41) 0.95 (0.80 to 1.13) 0.88 (0.71 to 1.09) 0.96 (0.77 to 1.19)
90 (61.0) 1.38 (1.08 to 1.76) 0.99 (0.77 to 1.26) 0.90 (0.65 to 1.25) 1.01 (0.72 to 1.43)
95 (63.0) 1.51 (1.07 to 2.13) 1.04 (0.74 to 1.46) 0.96 (0.62 to 1.49) 1.07 (0.67 to 1.72)
97.5 (64.0) 1.58 (1.05 to 2.38) 1.06 (0.71 to 1.60) 0.99 (0.60 to 1.65) 1.11 (0.64 to 1.93)

*Adjusted for smoking, physical activity, and education.

†Additionally to * adjusted for body fat percentage and body height. P<0.05, likelihood ratio test for effect.

‡Additionally to * adjusted for BMI (body mass index) and waist circumference. P<0.01, likelihood ratio test for effect.

¶Additionally to ‡ adjusted for alcohol, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. P<0.05, likelihood ratio test for effect.