Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 3;339:b3292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3292

Table 7.

  Figures are hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for associations between thigh circumference and coronary heart disease for 1380 women aged 35-65 followed for 10 years

Centile (thigh circumference in cm) Model 1* Model 2† Model 3‡ Model 4¶
2.5 (46.0) 2.20 (1.08 to 4.49) 4.56 (1.30 to 16.06) 4.65 (1.22 to 17.72) 2.45 (0.52 to 11.67)
5 (48.0) 1.75 (1.01 to 3.04) 3.11 (1.15 to 8.36) 3.50 (1.29 to 9.5) 2.26 (0.72 to 7.13)
10 (49.5) 1.48 (0.91 to 2.39) 2.34 (1.03 to 5.31) 2.82 (1.28 to 6.21) 2.12 (0.88 to 5.11)
25 (52.0) 1.16 (0.77 to 1.76) 1.51 (0.84 to 2.72) 1.92 (1.12 to 3.30) 1.77 (1.01 to 3.11)
50 (55.5) 1 1 1 1
75 (59.5) 1.00 (0.58 to 1.73) 0.76 (0.37 to 1.55) 0.55 (0.28 to 1.08) 0.54 (0.27 to 1.09)
90 (63.5) 0.97 (0.46 to 2.06) 0.59 (0.20 to 1.72) 0.48 (0.17 to 1.31) 0.54 (0.18 to 1.61)
95 (66.5) 0.95 (0.30 to 2.95) 0.49 (0.11 to 2.23) 0.50 (0.11 to 2.19) 0.66 (0.13 to 3.28)
97.5 (68.5) 0.93 (0.21 to 4.13) 0.43 (0.06 to 2.90) 0.52 (0.08 to 3.44) 0.77 (0.10 to 5.86)

*Adjusted for smoking, physical activity, education, and menopause.

†Additionally to * adjusted for body fat percentage and body height.

‡Additionally to * adjusted for BMI (body mass index) and waist circumference.

¶Additionally to ‡ adjusted for alcohol, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and triglycerides.