TABLE 4.
Group | Antimicrobial agentb | Susceptibility categorizationc
|
Cumulative % of isolates inhibited at MIC (mg/liter) of:
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% R | % I | % S | MIC50 (mg/liter) | MIC90 (mg/liter) | MIC range (mg/liter) | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 16 | ||
hVISA/VISAa (n = 27) | VAN | 0 | 3.7 | 96.3 | 1 | 2 | 0.5-4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.70 | 85.2 | 96.3 | 100 | 100 |
TEC | 0 | 0 | 100 | 2 | 8 | 0.5-8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.70 | 25.9 | 66.7 | 85.2 | 100 | |
DAP | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0.5 | 1 | 0. 25-1 | 0.0 | 14.8 | 88.9 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
TGC | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.032-0.5 | 44.4 | 92.6 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
BPR | 0 | 0 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.1 | 33.3 | 96.3 | 100 | 100 | |
LZD | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 2 | 0.5-2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 85.2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
VSSA (n = 173) | VAN | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 1 | 0.5-2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35.8 | 99.4 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
TEC | 0 | 0 | 100 | 2 | 4 | 0.125-4 | 0.58 | 2.89 | 12.1 | 49.1 | 79.8 | 100 | 100 | |
DAP | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.125-1 | 0.58 | 10.7 | 95.1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
TGC | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.032-0.5 | 54.3 | 90.2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
BPR | 0 | 0 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 0.25-2 | 0.0 | 2.31 | 4.62 | 27.2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
LZD | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1 | 2 | 0.125-2 | 0.58 | 1.16 | 31.2 | 82.7 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
The MICs for the VISA strain were as follows: vancomycin, 4 mg/liter; teicoplanin, 8 mg/liter; daptomycin, 0.5 mg/liter; tigecycline, 0.25 mg/liter; ceftobiprole, 0.5 mg/liter; and linezolid, 1 mg/liter.
VAN, vancomycin; TEC, teicoplanin; DAP, daptomycin; TGC, tigecycline; BPR, ceftobiprole; LZD, linezolid.
R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible.