Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 22;53(9):3642–3649. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00206-09

TABLE 4.

Activities of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, tigecycline, ceftobiprole, and linezolid against hVISA/VISA and VSSA strains

Group Antimicrobial agentb Susceptibility categorizationc
Cumulative % of isolates inhibited at MIC (mg/liter) of:
% R % I % S MIC50 (mg/liter) MIC90 (mg/liter) MIC range (mg/liter) 0.125 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 16
hVISA/VISAa (n = 27) VAN 0 3.7 96.3 1 2 0.5-4 0.0 0.0 3.70 85.2 96.3 100 100
TEC 0 0 100 2 8 0.5-8 0.0 0.0 3.70 25.9 66.7 85.2 100
DAP 0 0 100 0.5 1 0. 25-1 0.0 14.8 88.9 100 100 100 100
TGC 0 0 100 0.25 0.25 0.032-0.5 44.4 92.6 100 100 100 100 100
BPR 0 0 100 2 2 1-4 0.0 0.0 11.1 33.3 96.3 100 100
LZD 0 0 100 1 2 0.5-2.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 85.2 100 100 100
VSSA (n = 173) VAN 0 0 100 1 1 0.5-2 0.0 0.0 35.8 99.4 100 100 100
TEC 0 0 100 2 4 0.125-4 0.58 2.89 12.1 49.1 79.8 100 100
DAP 0 0 100 0.5 0.5 0.125-1 0.58 10.7 95.1 100 100 100 100
TGC 0 0 100 0.125 0.25 0.032-0.5 54.3 90.2 100 100 100 100 100
BPR 0 0 100 2 2 0.25-2 0.0 2.31 4.62 27.2 100 100 100
LZD 0 0 100 1 2 0.125-2 0.58 1.16 31.2 82.7 100 100 100
a

The MICs for the VISA strain were as follows: vancomycin, 4 mg/liter; teicoplanin, 8 mg/liter; daptomycin, 0.5 mg/liter; tigecycline, 0.25 mg/liter; ceftobiprole, 0.5 mg/liter; and linezolid, 1 mg/liter.

b

VAN, vancomycin; TEC, teicoplanin; DAP, daptomycin; TGC, tigecycline; BPR, ceftobiprole; LZD, linezolid.

c

R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible.