Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 17;83(17):8470–8481. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02568-08

TABLE 3.

Analysis of population structure between free plasma virus and provirus derived from monocytes, PBMC, and activated CD4+ T cells

Patient 154a analysis Gene amplified No. of independent sequences
SM analysisb
AMOVA analysis
Molecular diversity (π)
Free plasma virus Integrated provirus P
Adjusted Pc
Migration events (ML/BI) % Variation among or within populations P Adjusted P Free plasma virus Provirus
ML BI ML BI
Plasma virus vs provirus derived from activated CD4+ T cells RT 238 25 0.000 0.002 0.000 0.002 19/21 46.76 53.24 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.019
Plasma virus vs provirus derived from monocytes RT 238 17 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 12/13 46.64 53.36 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.020
Plasma virus vs provirus derived from unfractionated PBMC RT 238 83 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 35/36 42.27 57.73 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.021
a

Patient sequences were derived from Bailey et al. (1).

b

ML, phylogenetic trees were generated via a classical ML approach; BI, phylogenetic trees were generated via a Bayesian inference approach.

c

“Adjusted P” refers to P values obtained for both the SM tests and the AMOVA tests were subjected to Benjamini-Hochberg FDR corrections, treating P values obtained using the ML approach separately from those obtained using BI and both separately from the AMOVA tests (2).