Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct-Dec;12(4):158–162. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.45075

Table 1.

Comparison of study characteristics between normal RFT and mild renal dysfunction

Study characteristics Normal RFT(n=412) Mild Renal Dysfunction(n=76) P value
Age 57.8 ±8.3 62.1±8.42 <0.001**
Sex 361:51 69:07 0.433
DM 189 (45.87%) 37 (48.68%) 0.652
HTN 167 (40.53%) 45 (59.21%) 0.003**
COPD 12 (2.91%) 3 (3.94%) 0.714
CVA 7 (1.69%) 4 (5.26%) 0.076+
PVD 4 (0.97%) 2 (2.63%) 0.237
SMOKER 94 (22.81%) 16 (21.06%) 0.735
RECENT MI 14 (3.39%) 4 (5.26%) 0.502
NYHA 4 36 (8.73%) 7 (9.21%) 0.894
EF >40% 370 (89.80%) 60 (78.94%) 0.007**
EF <40% 42 (10.19%) 16 (21.1%) 0.007**
PRE OP.ACE 71 (17.23%) 4 (5.26%) 0.008**
CABG
 ON CPB 120(29.12%) 20(26.3%)
CPB(MINS) 100 ±41min 116 ±45 0.002**
ACX(MINS) 63.06 ±31.27 70.72 ±32.3 0.067+
BUN 11.34 ±3.47 16.65 ±6.81 <0.001**
S.CREATININE 1.02 ±0.16 1.61 ±0.2 <0.001**
GFR 78.44±16.26 51.30±9.53