Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Feb 25;204(4):573–585. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1489-4

Table 2.

Interpretation of differences between the experimental conditions

Measurea Withdrawal Acute
Caffeine
Effectsb
Chronic
Caffeine
Effectsc
Tolerance
Doppler
Middle Cerebral Artery
     Mean Velocity Xd, e, f X
     Systolic Velocity Xd, e, f X
     Diastolic Velocity Xd, e, f
     Pulsatility Index Xd, e, f
Anterior Cerebral Artery
     Mean Velocity Xe, f X
     Systolic Velocity Xe, f X
     Diastolic Velocity Xe, f X
EEG
     Relative Theta Xd, e, f
     Relative Beta2 Xe X X
Withdrawal Questionnaire
     Tired Xd, f
POMS
     Vigor Scale Xg, h
     Fatigue Scale X
     Friendly X Xg, h
     Lively X Xg, h
     Energetic Xd, f X Xg, h
     Fatigue Xe, f X
     Sluggish
     Weary Xd, f X Xg, h
     Efficient Xg
     Full of Pep X Xg, h
     Bushed X Xg, h
a

Column 1 lists dependent measures that had significant main effects in the ANOVA

b

Column 3 shows which measures demonstrated evidence of acute caffeine effects (significant difference between Plac/Caff and Plac/Plac)

c

Column 4 shows which measures demonstrated evidence of chronic caffeine effects (significant difference between Caff/Caff and Plac/Plac)

d

Significant difference between Caff/Plac and Plac/Plac (a conservative test of withdrawal)

e

Significant difference between Caff/Plac and Caff/Caff (a test of naturalistic withdrawal)

f

Significant difference between Caff/Plac and combined chronic maintenance conditions (Caff/Caff, Plac/Plac) (an overall test of withdrawal)

g

Significant difference between Plac/Caff and Caff/Caff (a test of tolerance)

h

Significant difference between Plac/Caff and Caff/Caff AND no significant difference between Caff/Caff and Plac/Plac (a test of “complete tolerance” development for those measures)