Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 11;10:245. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-245

Table 2.

Compared enrichment variations over 5 methods

CDK2 FXa NA RNAse TK
Enrichment 1%
CSR 11–56 0–63 33–100 100-100 22–78
SM 22–67 0–63 44–67 43–100 22–78
RC 11–56 0–38 67–100 29–57 44–100
2D 0–33 0–38 22–89 100-100 22–89

Enrichment 3%
CSR 33–56 0–63 56–100 100-100 33–89
SM 22–67 0–75 56–100 43–100 56–100
RC 22–67 0–63 78–100 29–86 56–100
2D 11–56 0–38 22–89 100-100 44–100

For 5 families of active compounds, we present for LigCSRre (CSR), MED-SuMoLig (SM), ROCS-cff (RC) and ChemMine (2D), the minimal and maximal enrichment scores at 1% and 3%. Results expressed in % of recovered co-active ligands.