Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 16;297(3):E665–E675. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00115.2009

Table 3.

Effects of AICAR, contraction, and insulin on AMPK, ACC, and Akt phosphorylation in WT EDL muscle

pAkt Thr308 pAkt Ser473 pAMPK Thr172 pACC Ser227
Basal 100±8.9 100±11 100±29 100±11
AICAR 148±16* 174±41* 266±17** 520±27**
Basal 124±26 113±13 101±15 120±21
Insulin 1,989±207** 2,726±215** 98.3±7.6 124±14
Basal 84.0±15 90.1±12 96.8±13 127±23
AICAR + insulin 1,962±168** 2,641±182** 279±9.8** 596±35**
Basal 115±20 84.8±6.9 125±28 124±19
Contraction 246±29* 287±23** 489±32**§ 476±20**
Basal 133±18 95.8±18 93.4±18 112±11
Insulin + contraction 1,758±159** 2,413±200** 486±57** 469±42**
Basal 102±14 77.1±11 88.5±14 132±18
AICAR + contraction 274±42* 336±47* 454±47**a 641±38**¤

Data are related to basal from AICAR trial and expressed as means ± SE; n = 8. Thr308 and Ser473: increase in phosphorylation was higher in insulin-stimulated muscle than AICAR- or contraction-stimulated muscle (‡P < 0.05). Combining insulin and AICAR or contraction did not increase phosphorylation above insulin levels. pAMPK Thr172: contraction increased phosphorylation to a higher extent than AICAR (§P < 0.05); combining AICAR and contraction increased phosphorylation above AICAR (‡P < 0.05) but not contraction levels. pACC Ser227: AICAR and contraction combined increased phosphorylation to a higher extent than AICAR or contraction alone (aP < 0.05).

*/**

P < 0.05/0.01 toward basal.