Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2008 Mar;48(7):926–936. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.020

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean correlations of oculomotor variables with performance for each subject, averaged across sessions. Error bars = 1 SE. The correlations between items scanned per fixation and performance were always (40/40) significant at the 0.05 level, and the correlations between forward saccade amplitude and performance were almost always (39/40) significant, whereas the correlations between fixation duration and performance typically were not (15/40).