Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Struct Biol. 2008 Dec 30;166(1):67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.12.008

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Model dependency test on synthetic data sets. Comparison of reconstructed structure resolution for NCCF and FE+MI. (a) FSC between reconstructions obtained from halves of the SF3b data when a ribosome template structure is used to align and assign Euler angles to the SF3b data. (b) FSC between reconstructions of the SF3b data and the ribosome data when a ribosome template structure is used to align and assign Euler angles to the two respective data sets. (c) FSC between reconstructions obtained from halves of the SF3b data when a SF3b template structure is used to align and assign Euler angles to the SF3b data. (d) FSC between (1) a reconstruction of the SF3b data obtained after alignment with the NCCF and FE+MI method and (2) a reconstruction of the SF3b data with no alignment error and no error in the assignment of Euler angles. A SF3b template was used to align and assign Euler angles to the SF3b data.