Table 4.
Method | Lifestyle (binary coding) vs.: | LN(PLg) | LN(10*MD) | Cg3 | P | Prad | S0.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIC | R2 | 0.2248 | 0.0542 | 0.0503 | 0.0653 | 0.0345 | 0.0025 |
P-value | 0.0008 (ii) | 0.1193 (xi) | 0.1338 (xii) | 0.0866 (x) | 0.2164 (xiv) | 0.7435 | |
T-test | P-value | 0.0120 (viii) | 0.1846 (xiii) | 0.0131 (ix) | 0.0092 (vii) | 0.0035 (v) | 0.3051 (xv) |
Equality of variance (for T-test) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
For the FIC analyses, proportion of explained variance and associated probabilities are shown. Only characters whose contrasts were adequately standardized are included. T-tests were conducted in Microsoft Excel, using formulae for samples of equal or unequal variances, depending on the character. For each character, equality of variances was tested through an F-test. Abbreviations as in Table 1.