Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 8;215(2):110–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01104.x

Table 4.

Relationship between lifestyle and phenotypic characters (body size and bone microanatomical characters) assessed through phylogenetically independent contrasts analysis [Felsenstein independent contrasts (FIC)] and T-tests

Method Lifestyle (binary coding) vs.: LN(PLg) LN(10*MD) Cg3 P Prad S0.1
FIC R2 0.2248 0.0542 0.0503 0.0653 0.0345 0.0025
P-value 0.0008 (ii) 0.1193 (xi) 0.1338 (xii) 0.0866 (x) 0.2164 (xiv) 0.7435
T-test P-value 0.0120 (viii) 0.1846 (xiii) 0.0131 (ix) 0.0092 (vii) 0.0035 (v) 0.3051 (xv)
Equality of variance (for T-test) No Yes Yes Yes Yes No

For the FIC analyses, proportion of explained variance and associated probabilities are shown. Only characters whose contrasts were adequately standardized are included. T-tests were conducted in Microsoft Excel, using formulae for samples of equal or unequal variances, depending on the character. For each character, equality of variances was tested through an F-test. Abbreviations as in Table 1.