Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2009 Jun 21;163(2):506–523. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.039

Table 1.

Tone Main Effects of ERO energy in B6 and D2 mice

Standard Tone Rare Tone Noise Tone Tone Effects
Frontal
0–50 ms
Delta Band −51.1 ± 2.8 −52.1 ± 3.0 −57.6 ± 3.4& F(1.5,96.1)=8.9, P<0.005
Theta Band −74.8 ± 4.3 −73.7 ± 4.4 −84.2 ± 5.3& F(1.7,108.8)=7.9, P<0.005
Alpha/Beta Band 332.6 ± 25.6 457.3 ± 31.4@ 676.1 ± 43.8& F(1.8,112.8)=54.3, P<0.001
50–350 ms
Delta Band 432.4 ± 30.2 428.8 ± 31.7 423.3 ± 27.6 F(1.4,89.0)=0.25, NS
Theta Band 1288.6 ± 70.4 1309.6 ± 79.0 1369.2 ± 87.9 F(1.5,95.1)=2.9, NS
Alpha/Beta Band 2804.9 ± 116.2 2868.9 ± 138.1 2976.8 ± 138.5 F(1.8,116.6)=3.7, P<0.05
350–800 ms
Delta Band 661.9 ± 46.9** 658.3 ± 51.1 601.7 ± 40.6 F(1.3,84.1)=5.7, P<0.05
Theta Band 1874.3 ± 101.9 1940.4 ± 110.5 1815.5 ± 128.7 F(1.5,95.1)=3.3, NS
Alpha/Beta Band 3778.8 ± 173.4 3659.4 ± 194.9 3245.3 ± 195.7& F(1.5,98.6)=16.5, P<0.001
Parietal
0–50 ms
Delta Band −42.4 ± 2.2 −40.9 ± 2.4 −39.4 ± 2.2 F(1.8,112.8)=1.7, NS
Theta Band −73.9 ± 3.4 −76.9 ± 3.9 −76.2 ± 3.9 F(1.7,109.8)=0.6, NS
Alpha/Beta Band 200.9 ± 19.0 266.9 ± 24.3@ 382.2 ± 35.0& F(1.6,103.7)=23.7, P<0.001
50–350 ms
Delta Band 311.0 ± 17.3 286.6 ± 16.5@ 260.4 ± 15.1& F(1.6,105.4)=13.7, P<0.001
Theta Band 1098.7 ± 49.2 1050.9 ± 49.7@ 929.0 ± 44.0& F(1.6,105.5)=27.8, P<0.001
Alpha/Beta Band 2915.9 ± 119.6 2896.5 ± 132.6 2904.7 ± 128.2 F(1.8,112.6)=0.04, NS
350–800 ms
Delta Band 472.7 ± 26.2 425.4 ± 23.3@ 381.3 ± 21.8& F(1.9,120.4)=22.9, P<0.001
Theta Band 1700.8 ± 78.9 1691.9 ± 82.5 1519.1 ± 83.2& F(1.9,123.6)=11.0, P<0.001
Alpha/Beta Band 4424.9 ± 187.7** 4225.5 ± 185.6 3942.8 ± 205.0 F(1.8,113.4)=9.2, P<0.001

Values are mean ± SEM. Represent statistically significant difference,

**

standard vs. noise tones;

&

noise vs. standard and rare tones;

@

rare vs. standard tones; (post hoc pairwise comparisons, P < 0.05).