Table 3.
Whole sample |
Only men |
Only women |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | |
Baron-Cohen eye test | 0.595*** | 0.508** | 0.507** | 0.219 | 0.223 | 1.319*** | 1.244*** |
(0.222) | (0.217) | (0.218) | (0.254) | (0.255) | (0.422) | (0.418) | |
Gender: Female = 1 | 6.997*** | 4.859** | |||||
(1.780) | (2.193) | ||||||
Testosterone (pg/mL) | −0.041 | −0.020 | −0.122** | ||||
(0.026) | (0.029) | (0.058) | |||||
Observations | 457 | 457 | 457 | 317 | 317 | 140 | 140 |
R-squared | 0.015 | 0.049 | 0.054 | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.056 | 0.080 |
This table shows Ordinary Least Squares regressions of the premium a subject was willing to pay to avoid a 50/50 lottery $0/$200 on his/her score in Baron-Cohen ″reading the mind in the eyes″ test. Test scores are negatively correlated with risk aversion. Heteroschedasticity robust standard errors are reported in brackets.
* Means significantly different from zero at the 10% level (two-tail t test),
** at the 5% level, and
*** at the 1% level.