Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 6;104(3):419–428. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.058

Table 2.

Intra- and inter-observer agreement for selected categorical echocardiographic findings

Variable Kappa (95% CI) Concordant One Grade Difference Two Grades Difference N3
Image Quality1
 Intra-observer 0.19 (0.04,0.34) 48 (48%) 49 (49%) 3 (3%) 100
 Inter-observer 0.16 (0.01,0.31) 44 (44%) 54 (54%) 2 (2%) 100
LV Dysfunction Grade2
 Intra-observer 0.58 (0.31,0.85) 53 (90%) 6 (10%) 0 (0%) 59
 Inter-observer 0.42 (0.12,0.71) 49 (83%) 9 (15%) 1 (2%) 59
RV Dysfunction Grade2
 Intra-observer 0.25 (0.01,0.50) 34 (74%) 10 (22%) 2 (4%) 46
 Inter-observer 0.12 (−0.12,0.36) 29 (62%) 18 (38%) 0 (0%) 47

CI = confidence intervals

1

Graded as excellent, good, or fair

2

Graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe.

3

Number of pairs of observations in which both observers agreed that the structure was present and evaluable. In patients with mixed ventricular type, LV and RV measurements were included in their respective ventricular morphology group.

CI: confidence interval; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle