Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2009 Jul 19;169(1):70–74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.06.018

Table 2.

Comparison of PAOFI, BDI and Neurocognitive Performance

Substance Abuse
Non-Clinical
P
Mean
SD
Median
Mean
SD
Median
Total PAOFI 6.5 7.7 4.0 3.0 4.6 1.0 <0.001a
  Memory 2.8 3.2 2.0 1.3 2.1 0.0 <0.001b
  Language 2.0 2.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 <0.001b
  Higher Cognitive 1.7 2.6 0.0 0.8 1.7 0.0 <0.001b
Adj. BDI 18.5 11.0 18.0 7.3 7.9 5.0 <0.001a
Neurocognitive performance
WRAT-III 96.5 12.7 99.0 99.3 10.8 99.0 0.028 a
PSI 92.4 14.1 91.0 97.2 13.1 96.0 0.001c
Verbal Fl. FAS 94.6 17.1 95.0 103.1 14.6 103.0 <0.001c
Verbal Fl. Animals 95.1 19.3 98.0 102.0 18.7 101.0 0.005 c
Trail A (seconds) 36.5 12.2 36.0 24.4 7.1 23.0 <0.001c
Trail B (seconds) 99.9 53.2 82.0 62.5 27.0 58.0 <0.001c
WCST Total Errors 84.8 17.3 86.0 104.9 11.5 103.0 <0.001c
WCST Pers. Resp 90.0 13.9 93.0 114.0 19.4 108.0 <0.001c
WCST Categories 2.4 1.6 2.0 3.0 1.5 3.0 <0.001c

Standard Scores

a

alpha level for significance: P<0.05

b

alpha level for significance: P<0.016

c

alpha level for significance: P<0.006