Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 15;9:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-203

Table 2.

Effect of each selected feature on the prediction.

Feature Estimate Std. Error t value p-value specificity
CodingAmniote, α = 0 0.0030645 0.0005186 5.910 3.47e-09 0.473
AssociationBreaks, β = 2 -0.0150509 0.0022701 -6.630 3.42e-11 0.572
CodingMetatheria, α = 2 1.3915142 0.2395547 5.809 6.36e-09 0.611
NonCodingMetatheria, α = 3 -0.0338532 0.1649918 -0.205 0.83743 0.625
CodingMetatheria, α = 0 -0.0079558 0.0014829 -5.365 8.15e-08 0.629
NonCodingMetatheria, α = 2 -0.0154798 0.0132948 -1.164 0.24429 0.630
CodingAmniote, α = 3 -4.6993169 0.9579974 -4.905 9.38e-07 0.634
AssociationBreaks, β = 3 0.0069784 0.0024624 2.834 0.00460 0.645
NonCodingMetatheria, α = 4 0.0302276 0.1104565 0.274 0.78435 0.645

Features are listed in the order in which they were selected by the forward feature selection procedure. The coefficient estimate, standard error, t-value, and p-value reported are those obtained for the linear regression with all 9 features. The specificity reported is that of the predictor built using the features starting from the 1st row down to the current row. The specificity is calculated for a sensitivity of 0.75. For example a specificity of 0.645 means that 75% of breakpoints are comprised within 35.5% of the total length of inter-marker regions used for the analysis.