Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct;99(10):1746–1752. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.148726

TABLE 2.

States and Jurisdictions That Do Not Allow Compensation of Incarcerated Research Participants

State or Jurisdiction Research Guidelines Comments
Connecticutb State of Connecticut Department of Corrections, administrative directive 1.7, section 1227 “Inmate Compensation: An inmate shall not be individually compensated for participating in any research project.”
District of Columbiab District of Columbia Department of Corrections, program statement: management controls—research activity28 “Incentives may not be offered to help persuade inmate subjects to participate. Reasonable accommodations such as nominal monetary recompense for time and effort may be offered to individuals who are no longer confined in DOC custody and who are participating in authorized research being conducted by DOC employees or contractors (for example, if study of recidivism).”
Federal Bureau of Prisonsb Federal Bureau of Prisons, program statement number 1070.07: research29 “Incentives may not be offered to help persuade inmate subjects to participate. However, soft drinks and snacks to be consumed at the test setting may be offered.”
Floridac No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.
Georgiaa State of Georgia, Georgia code 42-1-5: use of inmate for private gain30 DOC interprets Georgia code 42-1-5(b) to prohibit payment. According to this code: “It shall be unlawful for a custodian of an inmate of a penal institution to use such inmate or allow such inmate to be used for any purpose resulting in private gain to any individual.”
Indianaa No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.
Mainec No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.
Michiganab Michigan Department of Corrections, policy directive: research involving corrections facilities or offenders31 Policy directive does not specifically discuss compensation but states that “[c]oercion of any sort shall not be allowed.”
Minnesotac Minnesota Department of Corrections, policy 102.100: research32 Research policy does not discuss compensation.
Mississippia Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), research protocol SOP 10-0433 “MDOC staff and inmates engaged in any research activities are not entitled to gratuities or compensation of any kind.”
Montanab State of Montana Department of Corrections, policy directive number DOC 1.6.4: offender participation in research projects34 “Offenders will not be compensated, remunerated, or paid in connection with any Department approved research projects.”
Nebraskac Nebraska Correctional Services, administrative regulation 103.01: research35 Administrative regulation does not discuss compensation.
New Hampshirec New Hampshire Department of Corrections, policy and procedure directive: research and external application procedures36 Policy and procedure directive does not discuss compensation.
New Jerseyb State of New Jersey, administrative code: general research provisions37 “Inmates shall not be permitted to receive compensation of any kind for their research participation from any agency or entity conducting a research project.”
New Yorkb State of New York Department of Correctional Services, Directive 0403: research studies and surveys38 “No employee of the Department or inmate shall receive compensation, remuneration, or payment of any kind for participation in the research study.”
North Carolinaa No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.
North Dakotaa North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, policies and procedures manual: program information and research activities39 “No inmate shall receive compensation, remuneration or payment of any kind in connection with a research study.”
Ohiob State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, human subjects research policy 06-RES-0240 “Payment of any kind to inmates for their participation in research projects is not permitted.”
Oklahomaa Oklahoma Department of Corrections, procedures regulating research41 Procedures document does not discuss compensation.
South Carolinab South Carolina Department of Corrections, research conducted within the SCDC42 “Under no circumstance will inmates be monetarily reimbursed or provided any type of financial incentive for their participation in any research project.”
South Dakotac No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.
Tennesseeb State of Tennessee Department of Correction, administrative policies and procedures: research projects43 “Required components of informed consent include … [a]cknowledgment that no compensation of money or goods will be made to participants.”
Texasb Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), administrative directive AD-02.28: agency research44 Administrative directive does not discuss compensation. According to policy (available on DOC Web site): “Neither compensation nor incentives are allowed for participating in a research project. This policy applies to both offenders and staff of TDCJ. The informed consent submitted by the Principal Investigator must include this stipulation.”45
Utahc No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.
Virginiac Commonwealth of Virginia Board of Corrections, regulations for human subjects research46 Regulations do not discuss compensation.
Washingtonb State of Washington Department of Corrections, policy DOC 260.050: research review and use47 “Offenders may volunteer for participation… . There will not be any reward, favor, reduction of time, or any other benefit, either written or implied, for participation in research by staff or offenders under the legal jurisdiction of the Department.”
West Virginiac No written guidelines Compensation not permitted.

Note. DOC=department of corrections.

a

Information collected by email.

b

Information collected via state Web site.

c

Information collected via telephone.