Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 29;6(9):e1000154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000154

Table 3. Case-series analysis for thiazolidinediones: association between exposure to specific thiazolidinediones and fractures.

Fracture Site Exposure Patient Years n Fractures Age-Adjusted Rate Ratio for Fracture (95% CI)
Fracture at any site
Rosiglitazone (n = 1,356) Unexposed periods 12,772 1,139 Baseline
Exposed periods 3,180 543 1.49 (1.28–1.74)a
Pioglitazone (n = 389) Unexposed periods 3,747 347 Baseline
Exposed periods 892 149 1.26 (0.95–1.68)a
Foot, arm, wrist, or hand fracture
Rosiglitazone (n = 675) Unexposed periods 6,446 539 Baseline
Exposed periods 1,564 211 1.30 (1.03–1.64)
Pioglitazone (n = 188) Unexposed periods 1,748 158 Baseline
Exposed periods 446 61 1.43 (0.92–2.22)
Hip fracture
Rosiglitazone (n = 115) Unexposed periods 1,004 56 Baseline
Exposed periods 310 66 1.80 (1.03–3.15)
Pioglitazone (n = 32) Unexposed periods 282 13 Baseline
Exposed periods 75 20 2.65 (0.81–8.70)
Spine fracture
Rosiglitazone (n = 53) Unexposed periods 492 33 Baseline
Exposed periods 132 24 3.13 (1.35–7.21)
Pioglitazone (n = 11) Unexposed periods 107 7
Exposed periods 18 4 *

Patients exposed to both thiazolidinediones excluded.

a

Test for interaction (p = 0.47).

*: Insufficient outcomes to calculate rate ratio.