Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul;138(1):84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.072

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation after Ross procedure

Case Sex Age (y) Time since Ross (y) RV outflow tract RV-PA conduit lesion
1 M 42 Unknown Homograft (2nd) 21 mm Predominant stenosis
2 M 22 4 Homograft (2nd) 20 mm Predominant stenosis
3 F 12 5 Homograft 18 mm Mixed dysfunction
4 M 20 8 Homograft (reconstructed) Mixed dysfunction
5 M 38 2.5 Homograft 23 mm Predominant stenosis
6 F 26 5 Homograft 24 mm Predominant stenosis
7 M 11 7 Homograft 19 mm Predominant stenosis
8 M 13 10 Homograft 16 mm Predominant regurgitation
9 M 71 34 Porcine valve conduit (unknown) Predominant stenosis
10 F 24 8 Homograft (unknown) Predominant regurgitation
11 F 15 8 Homograft 20 mm Predominant regurgitation
12 M 48 31 Homograft (unknown) Predominant regurgitation

RV, Right ventricle; PA, pulmonary artery.