Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 23;94(9):3273–3281. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1532

Table 4.

Gender differences in 25(OH)D levels explained by variance components models (ACE)

ICC (95% CI)
Variance components
Model comparison
MZ DZ A C E X2 P value AIC(X2−2)
Overall 0.87 (0.81–0.94) 0.70 (0.59–0.87)
 ACE modela 36.5 (14.2–68.9) 51.0 (18.8–71.7) 12.5 (8.2–19.4)
 ACE modelb 68.9 (25.9–79.3) 0 (0–35.4) 31.1 (20.7–48.0) 109.86 <0.0001 107.86
Malec 0.95 (0.92–0.99) 0.59 (0.41–1.00)
 ACE model 85.9 (62.3–92.8) 0 (0–20.9) 14.1 (7.2–30.9)
 AE modeld 85.9 (62.3–92.8) 14.1 (7.2–30.9) 0 −2.00
 CE model 41.7 (16.3–62.0) 58.2 (38.0–83.7) 16.15 <0.0001 14.15
Femalec 0.77 (0.65–0.94) 0.76 (0.62–0.97)
 ACE model 17.6 (0–73.1) 38.2 (0–67.9) 44.2 (25.4–70.1)
 AE model 59.3 (34.2–75.6) 40.7 (24.4–65.8) 1.30 0.26 −0.70
 CE modeld 51.4 (29.2–68.3) 48.6 (31.7–70.8) 0.24 0.63 −1.76

ACE model: A = % variance explained by genetics; C = % variance explained by shared environment; E = % variance explained by unique environment. 

a

Adjusted for age. 

b

Adjusted for age, gender, physical activity, student status, and season. 

c

Adjusted for age, physical activity, student status, and season. 

d

Best-fitting model.