Abstract
Microtubule stabilizing and destabilizing agents are commonly used as anti-cancer agents. Although highly effective, success with these agents has been limited due to their relative insolubility, cumbersome synthesis/purification, toxic side effects, and development of multidrug resistance. Hence the identification of improved agents that circumvent one or more of these problems is warranted. We recently described the rational design of a series of triazole-based compounds as antimitotic agents (1). Members of this N-substituted 1,2,4-triazole family of compounds exhibit potent tubulin polymerization inhibition and broad spectrum cellular cytotoxicity. Here, we extensively characterize the in vitro and in vivo effects of our lead compound from the series, 1-methyl-5-(3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-4-yl)-1H-indole designated T115. We show that T115 competes with colchicine for its binding pocket in tubulin, produces robust inhibition of tubulin polymerization, and disrupts the microtubule network system inside the cells. In addition, T115 arrests human cancer cells in the G2/M phase of cell cycling, a hallmark of microtubule destabilizing drugs. T115 also inhibits cell viability of several cancer cell lines, including multi-drug resistant cell lines, in the low nanomolar range. No cytotoxicity was observed by T115 against normal human skin fibroblasts cell lines, and acute toxicity studies in normal non-tumor bearing mice indicated that T115 is well tolerated in vivo (maximum total tolerated dose = 400 mg/kg). In a mouse xenograft model using human colorectal (HT-29) and prostate (PC3) cancer cells, T115 significantly inhibited tumor growth when administered intra-peritoneally. Taken together, our results suggest that T115 is a potential drug candidate for cancer chemotherapy.
Keywords: microtubule, multidrug resistance
INTRODUCTION
Microtubules, as major components of the cytoskeleton, are indispensable for the formation and disappearance of the mitotic spindle that, in turn, is responsible for separation of duplicated chromosomes during cell division (2). The basic structural unit of microtubules is the heterodimer composed of alternating α tubulin and β tubulin subunits (3). The formation of microtubules is a dynamic process that involves the polymerization and depolymerization of α̣ and β tubulin heterodimers (3, 4). Disruption of microtubule formation, either by inhibiting polymerization or by preventing depolymerization of tubulin, results in cell-cycle arrest and cell death (5–8). Therefore, the microtubule system of eukaryotic cells is widely regarded as an attractive target for the development of anti-cancer therapeutic agents.
Tubulin binding compounds that suppress the microtubule dynamics and disrupt the formation of mitotic spindles have been used in the treatment of many cancers (9, 10). Prominent examples include the taxanes such as Taxol® and Taxotere®, and the vinca alkaloids such as vincristine, vinorelbine, and vinblastine. Despite their broad utility as anti-cancer agents, these anti-mitotic drugs employed in the clinic encounter issues related to their neural and systemic toxicity, marginal water solubility, poor bioavailability, complex synthetic pathways, and difficult isolation procedures (11–15). Moreover, development of intrinsic and extrinsic resistance to these agents further limits their clinical utility (14–16). The typical mode of administration of these compounds is intravenous, thereby adding discomfort and inconvenience for the patient and caregiver. Therefore, an urgent need exists for potent anti-mitotic agents that combine fewer side effects, reduced drug resistance, oral activity, and ease of synthesis.
Using computational approaches based on structure based drug design, we previously identified a defined series of triazole based compounds designated as T111–T115 that demonstrated robust tubulin anti-polymerization activity and exceptional cytotoxicity (1). Chemical synthesis of these compounds was accomplished via an efficient four-step procedure (1). The encouraging results from these initial studies have motivated us to further characterize the mechanism of action and anti-tumor activity of our lead compound T115.
Herein we show that T115 exhibits potent cytotoxicity in the low nanomolar range against a wide array of cancer cell lines, including multi-drug resistant cell lines, yet lacks cytotoxicity against normal skin fibroblasts. Furthermore, results from in vivo studies in mice reveal that T115 is well tolerated even at very high doses (MTTD= 400mg/kg) in healthy non-tumor bearing mice and inhibits tumor growth in colorectal xenografts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Drugs and Reagents
1-methyl-5-(3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-4-yl)-1H-indole (T115) was rationally designed and synthesized in our lab following procedures described elsewhere (1). Samples were purchased from the following vendors: Combretastatin A-4 from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO); [3H] colchicine from Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA); [3H]Paclitaxel and [3H]Vinblastine from Morevek Biochemicals (Brea, CA); and unlabeled Paclitaxel and colchicine from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Cell Lines and Culture Conditions
Human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), normal human fibroblasts (GM05659, FBCL), human cervical carcinoma cell line (KB-3-1), its multidrug-resistant variant (KB-V1), and cell line overexpressing ABCG2/BCRP (KB-H5.0) were kindly provided by Prof. L. F. Liu (Pharmacology Dept., University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway NJ). The other cell lines were obtained courtesy of Dr. W. N. Hait (Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick NJ). All of the cells were maintained at 37°C, 5% CO2 humidity atmosphere in media.
MTT Assay
Cells were plated with densities from 3000–6000 cells per well based on growth characteristics in 96-well tissue culture plates, allowed to attach overnight, and then exposed to various concentrations of tested drugs for 72 hours. Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) dissolved in PBS was added to each well with a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml, and cells were incubated at 37°C for 2–4 hours. After removal of MTT containing media, 150µl DMSO was added to dissolve formazan crystals in each well. Absorbance at 595nm was determined using a TECAN GENios multifunction microplate reader (TECAN U.S. Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC). IC50 values were calculated by non-linear regression analysis using Prism 3.03 (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated 3 independent times. Average values were reported here.
Flow Cytometry
The effect of T115 on the cell cycle of proliferating cells was studied by monitoring the DNA content in HeLa cells in the presence or absence of T115 at specified concentrations. The cells were treated at the indicated concentrations of T115 for 24 hours, trypsinized, washed with PBS twice and fixed by adding cold 70% ethanol dropwise on ice for 30 min. Approximately 1×106 cells were treated with 0.1mg/ml RNaseA and 5µg/ml propidium iodide in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Fluorescence intensity data were collected and analyzed by quantitative flow cytometry system Cytomics FC 500 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA).
Immunofluorescence Staining
Cells were grown on glass coverslips in a 12-well tissue culture plate until approximately 60% confluent, and then were treated at different concentrations for 24 hours. After fixing with ice-cold methanol at −20°C, coverslips were blocked with 3% BSA and stained with α-tubulin antibody (clone DM1A; Sigma Chemical Co.) or FITC conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.). Coverslips were then mounted using the ProLong Antifade Kit (Molecular Probes) and stored at −20°C.
Tubulin Competitive Binding Assay
Tubulin (>99% pure, Cytoskeleton Inc., CO) 0.2mg/ml was incubated with tritiated tubulin binders (0.1µM [3H]colchicine, 0.2µM [3H]vinblastine or 0.05µM [3H]paclitaxel) and test compounds at various concentrations in 100µl G-PEM buffer (80mM PIPES pH6.8, 0.5mM EGTA, 2.0mM MgCl2, 1.0mM GTP plus 5% glycerol) at 37°C for 1hr. The binding mixture was filtered with GF/C glass microfiber filter (Whatman, UK) and washed twice before scintillation counting was performed on a Packard TRI-CARB 2300TR liquid scintillation analyzer (Perkin Elmer, IL).
Tubulin Polymerization Assay
Tubulin polymerization assays were conducted using the CytoDYNAMIX Screen™ 03 (Cytoskeleton Inc., CO.) assay system following the manufacturer’s instructions. Tubulin (>99% pure, Cat# TL238) was reconstituted to 3mg/ml using G-PEM buffer. 100 µl of the reconstituted tubulin was added to each well of a pre-warmed 96-well plate and exposed to test compounds at varying concentrations (0.1µM–10µM). The absorbance at 340nm was recorded every 60 sec for one hour using a TECAN GENios multifunction microplate reader (TECAN U.S. Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC) at 37°C. The dose-response curves were plotted using Prism 3.03 (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).
In Vivo Antitumor Activity
The effect of T115 on growth of colorectal and prostate xenografts was studied at Washington Biotechnology Inc. (Columbia, MD). HT-29, human colorectal carcinoma cells, and PC3, human prostate cancer cells, were injected subcutaneously in the left and right flank (1 × 106) of NCR nu−/nu− mice. After ten days (day 0) when tumors reached a mean volume of 300–400 mm3, mice were randomized into two groups (six mice each group) and treatment was started. T115 was administered by intra-peritoneal injection at 90mg/kg or 60mg/kg on days 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8.90mg/kg represents maximum tolerable dose in a single injection, which was established before the efficacy experiments. No weight loss or other signs of distress like hunched posture were observed at either dose. As a vehicle control DMSO was injected at 2ml/kg concentration. Measurements of mice weight and tumor volumes were recorded every other day with digital caliper.
RESULTS
T115 (1-methyl-5-(3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-4-yl)-1H-indole) (Figure 1a) is the lead compound from a family of novel tubulin polymerization inhibitors that were rationally designed and synthesized in our laboratory. These compounds, which possess a triazole core structure, were easily prepared using a four-step procedure as described previously (1). The results presented here support our conclusion that T115 is a highly potent and worthy of further development as a viable drug candidate for anti-cancer therapy.
Figure 1.
Effect of T115 (1-methyl-5-(3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-4-yl)-1Hindole; A) on tubulin binding of [3H]colchicine (B), [3H]vinblastine (C) and [3H]paclitaxel (D). Tubulin (>99% pure) was incubated with tritiated tubulin binders in the presence of either unlabeled drugs or T115 at indicated concentrations for 1 hr at 37°C. Data points represent means ± S.E. obtained from three independent experiments.
T115 binds to colchicine binding site
Clinically-used compounds targeting microtubule system have been classified into three major categories based on notable ligands that target specific binding sites: taxane, vinca alkaloid, and colchicine (10). T115 (in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 µM) inhibited [3H]colchicine binding, but not [3H]vinblastine or [3H]paclitaxel, to >99% pure tubulin protein (Figures 1B–D). The ability of T115 to compete effectively and specifically with [3H]colchicines suggests that T115 binds to the colchicine binding site located in the tubulin β-subunit (17), but not to the vinca alkaloid or paclitaxel sites.
T115 inhibits microtubule polymerization
To investigate the effect of T115 on microtubule polymerization, bovine brain tubulin (>99% pure) was treated with T115 or CA-4 at the indicated concentrations (0.1–10µM) for 60 minutes at 37°C (Figure 2). The content of polymerized microtubules was monitored by measuring optical density at 340 nm every minute for an hour. At all concentrations tested, T115 exhibited inhibition of microtubule formation comparable to the known microtubule polymerization inhibitors CA-4 and colchicine, suggesting that T115 possesses strong anti-tubulin polymerization activity.
Figure 2.
Effect of T115 on microtubule polymerization in vitro. Tubulin (>99% pure, 0.3mg/assay) was exposed to T115, CA-4 or colchicine at concentrations ranging from 0.1µM- 10µM (vehicle control: 0.1% DMSO). Absorbance at 340 nm was recorded at 37°C every min. for 60 min.
T115 arrests HeLa cells in G2/M phase and disrupts microtubule apparatus inside these cells
To examine the effect of T115 on the cell cycle, HeLa cells were exposed to 10 nM, 20 nM and 40 nM T115 for 24 hours. The distributions of treated cells at different phases of cell cycle (G1, S, G2/M) were analyzed using flow cytometry by propidium iodide staining of DNA. As shown in Figure 3, cells treated with T115 arrest in G2/M phase: 78% cells accumulated in G2/M phase at 40 nM concentration as compared to only 13% in vehicle treated control. These results suggest that T115 arrests cell cycling at the G2/M phase in a dose-dependent manner.
Figure 3.
Effect of T115 on cell cycle progression. HeLa cells were treated with 0.1% DMSO (vehicle control) or T115 at indicated concentrations for 24 hr, trypsinized, fixed and stained with propidium iodide. A. Cell distribution (X-axis, arbitrary unit) versus DNA content (Y-axis, arbitrary unit). B. The percentage of cells in each mitotic phase pre- and post-treatment.
We further investigated the effect of T115 on microtubule re-organization inside the cells by immunostaining. HeLa and MCF-7 cells were exposed to media containing either 25 nM, 50 nM or 100 nM of T115 for 24 hours after which microtubules were visualized with FITC conjugated antibody (green) and cell nuclei stained using DAPI (blue). As shown in Figure 4a (HeLa) and 4b (MCF-7), vehicle treated controls contain microtubule networks that are clearly well-organized; however, when the cells were treated with 25 nM T115, multi-nucleated cells were observed. Microtubule distribution was disordered and long microtubule fibers were rarely seen after treatment with ≥50 nM T115. Microtubules exhibited less staining when the treatment of T115 was increased to 100 nM. Taken together, these results suggest that treatment with T115 disrupts the micro-tubule assembly inside the cells that is essential for formation of the mitotic spindle and segregation of condensed chromosomes.
Figure 4.
Effect of T115 on microtubule network organization. HeLa (A) or MCF-7 (B) cells were grown in DMEM containing either 0.1% DMSO, CA-4 or T115 at indicated concentrations for 24 hr, stained for α-tubulin using FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (green), and visualized by fluorescent microscopy with a 40X oil immersion lens. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images are representative of two independent experiments.
T115 inhibits viability of cancer cells from various tissues of origin
Next, we examined the effect of T115 on the viability of cancer cells using MTT assays as described in Materials and Methods. As shown in Table 1, additional evaluation indicated that T115 exhibits uniformly potent cytotoxicity against a broad spectrum of carcinoma cells (Table 1) including ovarian, prostate, and leukemia derived cell lines. In contrast, T115 was non-cytotoxic to normal human cell line GM05659 and FBLC at concentrations of 10 µM, providing a selectivity index of 500 to 1000 fold when compared to GI50 values for cancer cell lines. These data suggest that T115 exhibits both potent and selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells.
Table 1.
Growth inhibitory effect of T115 in major cancer cell lines and their drug-resistance subclones.
| GI50 (nM)* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Line | Origin | T115 | Colchicine | Paclitaxel |
| MCF-7 | Breast | 4.3±0.2 | 2.5±0.3 | <0.1 |
| MCF-7-Adr | Breast (MDR+) | 13±3 | 327±72 | 3856±729 |
| BC-19 | Breast (MDR+) | 3.2±2.3 | 6.1±1.5 | 33±7 |
| A2780 | Ovarian | 21±8 | 3.0±1.3 | <0.1 |
| A2780-DX | Ovarian (MDR+) | 24±6 | 12±8 | 272±65 |
| KB-3-1 | Cervix | 9.9±1.5 | 2.7±0.4 | <0.1 |
| KB-4-D-10 | Cervix (MRP+) | 5.7±2.1 | 6.5±3.5 | <0.1 |
| KB-V1 | Cervix (MDR+) | 21±0.7 | 757±99 | >10000 |
| KB-H5.0 | Cervix | 13.8±3.5 | ND | ND |
| PC-3 | Prostate | 20±7 | 6.6±2.6 | >10000 |
| PC-3-Adr | Prostate (MRP+) | 24±12 | 44±15 | >10000 |
| P388S | Leukemia | 2.1±1.0 | 0.21±0.08 | 23±11 |
| P388-VMDRC | Leukemia (MDR+) | 2.3±1.1 | 267±90 | 238±128 |
| GM 05659 | Normal | >10000 | ND | ND |
| FBCL | Normal | >10000 | ND | ND |
Mean ± SD (n=3).
ND: not determined
T115 is active against multidrug-resistant cancer cell lines
The cytotoxicity of T115 was also evaluated against six drug-resistant carcinoma cell lines (Table 1). T115 consistently yielded low-nanomolar IC50 values in all tested drug-resistant cells independent of phenotypes (P-gp/MDR or MRP or ABCG2). In addition, T115 inhibited the growth of both endogenous MDR1 over-expressing cells (MCF-7-Adr) and MDR1 transfected cells (BC-19). Both paclitaxel and colchicine are ineffective against many of these drug resistant cell lines. Thus, the present results indicate that T115 is not a substrate for the Pgp/ MDR, MRP1, or ABCG2 pumps.
T115 inhibits tumor growth in colorectal and prostate xenografts in vivo
We next examined the effect of T115 on colorectal and prostate tumor growth in mice. 1×106 HT-29, colorectal cancer cells and PC3, prostate cancer cells were inoculated in each flank of NCR nu-/nu- mice. The treatment was started when tumor reached a mean volume of 300–400 mm3. T115 was administered by intra-peritoneal injection at 90mg/kg or 60mg/kg on days 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8. As a vehicle control, DMSO was injected at 2ml/kg concentration.
As shown in Figure 5a and 5b, therapeutic treatment with T115 at doses of 60 or 90 mg/kg significantly inhibited tumor growth (p = 0.02) after the first dose. After five doses of T115, the tumor growth continued to remain significantly (p < 0.001) inhibited for at least ten days, after which the study was terminated due to excessive tumor load in vehicle treated group. No clinical signs of distress, such as weight loss or hunched posture, were associated with T115 treatment at this dose. These results thus show that T115 inhibits the growth of tumors in vivo.
Figure 5.
In vivo activity of T115 in mice bearing HT-29 colorectal (A) or PC3 prostate (B) xenografts. NCR nu−/nu− mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 HT-29 or PC3 cells and after tumor formation treated with either T115 (60 and 90 mg/kg) or vehicle i.p. Treatments were given on days 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 as described in Materials and Methods. The tumor volumes were recorded every other day using digital caliper. Each point represents mean tumor volume for the six animals in each group.
DISCUSSION
The microtubule system is a well validated target for the development of anti-cancer drugs. Controlled regulation of microtubule assembly and disassembly is critical for normal cell division, and thus cancer growth.
The general mode of action of these microtubule binding molecules is to arrest cell cycle progression by interrupting mitotic spindle formation and chromosome segregation (18). However, most if not all clinically available microtubule binding compounds encounter problems associated with chemical instability, poor bioavailability, and peripheral neurotoxicity (11–15, 19). In addition, many clinically used microtubule drugs induce several drug resistance phenotypes (16, 20, 21). We have developed a novel family of 1,2,4-triazole based compounds that may overcome many of these difficulties.
In this report we describe the characterization of one of our lead compounds, T115, from this triazole-based series. T115 is a structural analogue of CA-4 (Figure 1); however, the double bond in the cis-stilbene core structure of several CA-4 analogues is known to racemize to a trans conformation which abolishes tubulin anti-polymerization activity and cytotoxicity against tumor cell lines (11, 12, 19). In contrast, the 1,2,4-triazole core structure in T115 and its analogues were specifically designed to stabilize the biologically active cis conformation that might account for their excellent cytotoxicity (Table 1).
T115 was shown to inhibit tubulin polymerization by targeting the colchicine binding pocket in β-tubulin. T115 exhibited a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the polymerization of tubulin heterodimers, suggesting that T115 is a potent microtubule polymerization inhibitor. Employing cell-based immunofluorescence staining assays against α-tubulin, we observed that T115 causes disorder and fragmentation of the microtubule network and disrupts mitotic spindle formation. At low concentrations (25–50 nM), T115 inhibited chromosome separation during mitosis which results in the formation of multinucleated cells. When HeLa and MCF-7 cells were treated with T115 at increased concentration (100 nM), significant loss of FITC fluorescence was observed reflecting severe destruction of the microtubule system.
Tubulin binding agents are capable of interfering with the progression of cell cycle at the early mitotic (M2) phase (22, 23). After exposure to 20 nM T115 for 24 hours, ~70% of the HeLa cells were observed to have doubled in DNA content. This finding suggests that the chromosomes failed to segregate following replication, stalling the cell cycle at the metaphase checkpoint and allowing mitotic arrest.
An intriguing feature of our study is that T115 exhibits potent antiproliferative activities against multi-drug resistant cell lines. Exposure to T115 decreased the viability of both endogenous and transfected P-gP over-expressing cells, specifically MCF-7-Adr (breast), BC-19 (breast), A2780-DX (ovary), KB-V1 (cervix), and P388-VMDRC (murine leukemia) in vitro. Moreover, T115 showed consistently high cytotoxicity across the NCI-DTP panel of 60 cell lines. T115 maintained high cytotoxicity among MDR phenotypes in the NCI-DTP panel, including the in vitro drug selected NCI/ADR cell line (breast), and the naturally MDR cancer cell lines HCT-15 (colon), UO-31 (renal) and TK10 (renal) (1, 24). Taken together, these data suggest that T115 possesses broad-spectrum cytotoxicity activity and is not a substrate for either Pgp/ MDR , MRP or ABCG2 (BCRP) in contrast to many clinically used chemotherapeutic drugs.
The robust anti-mitotic and anti-proliferative effects of T115 confirm its potential as a candidate for cancer therapy. Due to the uniformly strong lethality by T115 against colorectal cells in the NCI-DTP panel (1), a colorectal cancer xenograft model was chosen to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of T115 in vivo. The in vivo study on human colorectal xenograft tumors in mice revealed that T115 inhibited tumor growth in a statistically significant manner at a dose of 90 mg/kg compared with vehicle treated mice. Furthermore, at these treatment doses T115 exhibited negligible visible side effects like weight loss, hunch posture, etc., that are commonly seen with other chemotherapeutic agents. To further expand our characterization of T115, we investigated its effect on prostate cancer xenografts. Encouragingly, we found that T115 inhibited the growth of prostate cancer tumors even at a lower dose of 60mg/kg.
T115 represents a novel molecular structure with potent and selective inhibitory effect against several cancer cells and, importantly, their drug resistance variants. From a structural standpoint, T115 eliminates the instability of stilbene-like CA-4 analogues by incorporating the 1,2,4-triazole core as a bridge to retain the biologically active cis configuration. This compound is synthetically accessible via a simple four-step mechanism (1). The hydrochloride salt of T115 was found to be soluble in water up to 2mg/ml in our studies. Further, the T115 base is soluble in 0.1% DMSO and 99.9% water at concentrations as high as 100µM. Further, T115 exhibited significant reduction of tumor load and inhibition of tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, the results presented here encourage further pre-clinical development of T115 as a potential drug candidate for chemotherapy.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Support for this work has been provided by the USEPA-funded Environmental Bioinformatics and Computational Toxicology Center (ebCTC), under STAR Grant number GAD R 832721-010 to WJW. WJW also gratefully acknowledges support for this work provided by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, under contract number HDTRA-BB07TAS020. This work was also funded in part by NIH R21-GM081394 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and by NIH Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems (IAIMS) Grant # 2G08LM06230-03A1 from the National Library of Medicine. This work has not been reviewed by and does not represent the opinions of the funding agencies.
REFERENCES
- 1.Zhang Q, Peng Y, Wang XI, Keenan SM, Arora S, Welsh WJ. Highly potent triazole-based tubulin polymerization inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2007;50:749–754. doi: 10.1021/jm061142s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wittmann T, Hyman A, Desai A. The spindle: a dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:E28–E34. doi: 10.1038/35050669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lowe J, Li H, Downing KH, Nogales E. Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. J Mol Bio. 2001;313:1045–1057. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Inoue S, Fuseler J, Salmon ED, Ellis GW. Functional organization of mitotic microtubules. Physical chemistry of the in vivo equilibrium system. Biophys J. 1975;15:725–744. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85850-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jordan MA, Wendell K, Gardiner S, Derry WB, Copp H, Wilson L. Mitotic block induced in HeLa cells by low concentrations of paclitaxel (Taxol) results in abnormal mitotic exit and apoptotic cell death. Cancer Res. 1996;56:816–825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Woods CM, Zhu J, McQueney PA, Bollag D, Lazarides E. Taxol-induced mitotic block triggers rapid onset of a p53-independent apoptotic pathway. Mol Med. 1995;1:506–526. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takano Y, Okudaira M, Harmon BV. Apoptosis induced by microtubule disrupting drugs in cultured human lymphoma cells. Inhibitory effects of phorbol ester and zinc sulphate. Pathol Res Pract. 1993;189:197–203. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80092-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tsukidate K, Yamamoto K, Snyder JW, Farber JL. Microtubule antagonists activate programmed cell death (apoptosis) in cultured rat hepatocytes. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:918–925. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hait WN, Rubin E, Goodin S. Tubulin-targeting agents. Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif. 2005;22:35–59. doi: 10.1016/s0921-4410(04)22003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jordan MA, Wilson L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:253–265. doi: 10.1038/nrc1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ohsumi K, Nakagawa R, Fukuda Y, et al. Novel combretastatin analogues effective against murine solid tumors: design and structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem. 1998;41:3022–3032. doi: 10.1021/jm980101w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pettit GR, Rhodes MR, Herald DL, et al. Antineoplastic agents 393. Synthesis of the trans-isomer of combretastatin A-4 prodrug. Anticancer Drug Des. 1998;13:981–993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pettit GR, Singh SB, Hamel E, Lin CM, Alberts DS, Garcia-Kendall D. Isolation and structure of the strong cell growth and tubulin inhibitor combretastatin A-4. Experientia. 1989;45:209–211. doi: 10.1007/BF01954881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cavaletti G, Cavalletti E, Oggioni N, et al. Distribution of paclitaxel within the nervous system of the rat after repeated intravenous administration. Neurotoxicology. 2000;21:389–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Windebank AJ. Chemotherapeutic neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol. 1999;12:565–571. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199910000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dumontet C, Sikic BI. Mechanisms of action of and resistance to antitubulin agents: microtubule dynamics, drug transport, and cell death. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1061–1070. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ravelli RB, Gigant B, Curmi PA, et al. Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain. Nature. 2004;428:198–202. doi: 10.1038/nature02393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Islam MN, Iskander MN. Microtubulin binding sites as target for developing anticancer agents. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2004;4:1077–1104. doi: 10.2174/1389557043402946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pettit GR, Toki BE, Herald DL, et al. Antineoplastic agents. 410. Asymmetric hydroxylation of trans-combretastatin A-4. J Med Chem. 1999;42:1459–1465. doi: 10.1021/jm9807149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bitton RJ, Figg WD, Reed E. A preliminary risk-benefit assessment of paclitaxel. Drug Saf. 1995;12:196–208. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199512030-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cole SP, Deeley RG. Multidrug resistance mediated by the ATP-binding cassette transporter protein MRP. Bioessays. 1998;20:931–940. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199811)20:11<931::AID-BIES8>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Simoni D, Grisolia G, Giannini G, et al. Heterocyclic and phenyl double-bond-locked combretastatin analogues possessing potent apoptosis-inducing activity in HL60 and in MDR cell lines. J Med Chem. 2005;48:723–736. doi: 10.1021/jm049622b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kanthou C, Greco O, Stratford A, et al. The tubulin-binding agent combretastatin A-4-phosphate arrests endothelial cells in mitosis and induces mitotic cell death. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:1401–1411. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63398-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shoemaker RH. The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:813–823. doi: 10.1038/nrc1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





