Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jan 23;52(4):981–1000. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/008

Table 3.

Comparison of the test performance of the FFDM and SFM CAD systems with the CNN and LDA classifiers at different detection sensitivities. (a) The FP cluster rates were estimated from the test subsets with MCCs. (b) The FP cluster rates were estimated from the test sets without MCCs

(a) (b)

Sensitivity 70% 80% 90% 70% 80% 90%
Cluster-based FFDM 0.21 0.61 1.50 0.15 0.31 0.81
SFM 0.38 1.21 -- 0.16 0.38 --
Case-based FFDM 0.07 0.16 0.63 0.04 0.11 0.33
SFM 0.15 0.38 2.02 0.08 0.14 0.50