Table 3.
Comparison of the test performance of the FFDM and SFM CAD systems with the CNN and LDA classifiers at different detection sensitivities. (a) The FP cluster rates were estimated from the test subsets with MCCs. (b) The FP cluster rates were estimated from the test sets without MCCs
| (a) | (b) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 70% | 80% | 90% | 70% | 80% | 90% | |
| Cluster-based | FFDM | 0.21 | 0.61 | 1.50 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.81 |
| SFM | 0.38 | 1.21 | -- | 0.16 | 0.38 | -- | |
| Case-based | FFDM | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.33 |
| SFM | 0.15 | 0.38 | 2.02 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.50 | |