. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 11.

Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2005 Sep;32(9):2827–2838. doi: 10.1118/1.1997327

Table I.

Estimation of the statistical significance in the difference between the FROC performance of the CAD system using the FFDM raw images as input and processed with our Laplacian pyramid method and that of the CAD system using GE processed images as input. The FROC curves with the FP rates obtained from the no-mass data set (Fig. 9) were compared.

	A₁ (AFROC)			FOM (JAFROC)
	Test subset 1	Test subset 2	p values	Test subset 1	Test subset 2	p values
Raw+LP processed	0.44	0.39	0.012	0.46	0.41	0.006
GE processed	0.37	0.31	0.0009	0.39	0.34	0.012