Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Ethics Behav. 2009 Jul 1;19(4):263–289. doi: 10.1080/10508420903035257

Table 3. Analysis of Covariance Results for Ethical Decision-Making.

	Data Management				Study Conduct				Professional Practices				Business Practices
	(M = 2.22, SE = .021)				(M = 2.24, SE = .021)				(M = 2.22, SE = .016)				(M = 2.20, SE = .027)

	F	df	p	η²_p	F	df	p	η²_p	F	df	p	η²_p	F	df	p	η²_p

Covariates
Intelligence					24.41	1,186	.001	.116	16.73	1,187	.001	.082	4.86	1,186	.029	.025
Self-Deceptive Enhancement	4.84	1,186	.029	.025
Extraversion													3.46	1,186	.065	.018
Neuroticism	5.67	1,186	.018	.030	3.45	1,186	.065	.018
Anxiety	5.11	1,186	.025	.027
Effects
Field	5.95	2,186	.003	.060	42.11	2,186	.001	.312	6.64	2,187	.002	.066	2.08	2,186	.127	.022
Experience	2.21	1,186	.139	.012	.28	1,186	.597	.002	.182	1,187	.670	.001	.150	1,186	.699	.001
Field by Experience	5.36	2,186	.005	.054	4.76	2,186	.010	.049	3.15	2,187	.045	.033	.468	2,186	.627	.005

Note. F = F- ratio, df = degrees of freedom, p = significance level, η²_p = partial eta-squared effect size estimate.