Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;11(5):382–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00070.x

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards analyses, all patients (n= 379)*

Stage/score HR 95% CI P-value c-statistic
Okuda staging system
A (n= 73) Ref. 0.62 0.50
B (n= 228) 0.85 0.58–1.24
C (n= 3) 1.52 0.20–11.67
IHPBA staging system
T1 (n= 69) Ref. 0.62 0.52
T2 (n= 284) 1.11 0.72–1.70
T3 (n= 26) 1.42 0.71–2.83
CLIP score
0 (n= 215) Ref. 0.48 0.51
1 (n= 83) 1.32 0.89–1.94
2 (n= 20) 1.56 0.70–3.46
3 (n= 2) 1.45 0.19–10.9
BCLC staging system
0 (n= 69) Ref. 0.74 0.51
A1–A3 (n= 263) 1.11 0.72–1.71
A4 (n= 47) 1.26 0.70–2.29
JIS score
0 (n= 52) Ref. 0.35 0.52
1 (n= 259) 1.23 0.76–2.00
2 (n= 56) 1.53 0.83–2.81
3 (n= 12) 2.32 0.85–6.36
AJCC/UICC staging system
T1 (n= 256) Ref. <0.001 0.59
T2 (n= 123) 2.17 1.61–2.93
Early HCC prognostic score
0 (n= 59) Ref. <0.001 0.600
1 (n= 225) 1.18 0.72–1.95
2 (n= 95) 2.46 1.44–4.19
*

All models were stratified by type of surgery to account for differential survival between treatment modalities

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref., referent; IHPBA, International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association; CLIP, Cancer of the Liver Italian Programme; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; JIS, Japanese Integrated Staging; AJCC/UICC, American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer, 6th edition; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma