Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;11(5):382–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00070.x

Table 5.

Cox proportional hazards analyses, liver transplantation (n= 134)*

Stage/score HR 95% CI P-value c-statistic
IHPBA staging system
T1 (n= 39) Ref. 0.15 0.56
T2 (n= 79) 1.36 0.63–2.96
T3 (n= 16) 2.82 1.04–7.67
CLIP score
0 (n= 35) Ref. 0.60 0.54
1 (n= 42) 1.77 0.75–4.18
2 (n= 17) 1.63 0.56–4.69
3 (n= 2) 1.69 0.21–13.6
BCLC staging system
0 (n= 39) Ref. 0.28 0.54
A1–A3 (n= 63) 1.34 0.60–3.00
A4 (n= 32) 2.02 0.84–4.84
JIS score
0 (n= 23) Ref. 0.07 0.52
1 (n= 62) 3.78 1.11–12.9
2 (n= 39) 3.22 0.91–11.4
3 (n= 10) 5.11 1.13–23.1
AJCC/UICC staging system
T1 (n= 92) Ref. 0.02 0.58
T2 (n= 42) 2.29 1.19–4.42
Early HCC prognostic score
0 (n= 34) Ref. 0.01 0.60
1 (n= 79) 1.39 0.59–3.28
2 (n= 21) 4.24 1.58–11.3
*

The Okuda staging system was omitted because observations in stages A (n= 0) and C (n= 1) were too few

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref., referent; IHPBA, International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association; CLIP, Cancer of the Liver Italian Programme; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; JIS, Japanese Integrated Staging; AJCC/UICC, American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer, 6th edition; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma