Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):270–280. doi: 10.1037/a0013223

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics

Nominal
Variables
Continuous
Variables
Characteristic Value % Mean S.D.
Gender
 Male 0 14.4
 Female 1 85.6
Race
 Non-Caucasian 0 36.6
 Caucasian 1 63.4
Education
 Less than graduate 0 42.5
 At least some graduate 1 57.5
EBP condition
 Services as usual (SAU) 0 41.8
 In SafeCare (SC) 1 58.2
Monitoring condition
 No monitoring (Non) 0 50.3
 Monitoring (M) 1 49.7
Indicators for 2×2 design
 SC/M 1 28.1
 SC/Non 1 30.1
 SAU/M 1 21.6
 SAU/Non 1 20.2
Age (years) 36.84 10.23
Job tenure (months) 31.05 36.67
Job Autonomy 5.50 .97
Turnover intentions 1.04 .95
Work attitudes 2.85 .67

Notes: N = 153. Data are from baseline survey. EBP = evidence-based practice; SC/M = participating in SafeCare and fidelity monitoring; SC/Non = participating in SafeCare, but not fidelity monitoring; SAU/M = services as usual and receiving fidelity monitoring; and SAU/Non = services as usual and not receiving fidelity monitoring. SC/M is the reference category in the analytic models.