Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Sep;21(9):1489–1495. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060601

Table 2.

Association Between Estimated Volumetric BMD or Bone Size at 9.9 Years of Age and Fracture Risk Over the Following 2 Years

Model OR for risk of fracture
[OR (95% CI) p value]
Model 1: TBLH BMC minimally adjusted 1.07 (0.97, 1.19) 0.186
 Model 1 additionally adjusted for height 1.25 (1.06, 1.48) 0.009
 Model 1 additionally adjusted for weight 1.40 (1.16, 1.69) 0.001
 Model 1 additionally adjusted for height and weight 1.57 (1.26, 1.96) <0.001
 Model 1 additionally adjusted for height, weight and TBLH BA 1.89 (1.18, 3.04) 0.009
Model 2: TBLH BA minimally adjusted 1.04 (0.94, 1.15) 0.495
 Model 2 additionally adjusted for height 1.18 (0.99, 1.42) 0.071
 Model 2 additionally adjusted for weight 1.28 (1.05, 1.56) 0.013
 Model 2 additionally adjusted for height and weight 1.51 (1.17, 1.95) 0.002

Association between TBLH BMC and TBLH BA measured at 9.9 years of age and risk of fracture over the following 2 years. Table shows ORs for fracture per SD decrease in TBLH BMC or TBLH BA calculated by logistic regression. Minimally adjusted models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. Additional models are shown in which analyses are adjusted for height and/or log-transformed weight and for TBLH BMC additionally adjusted for TBLH BA.