Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 9;284(31):20602–20614. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.006692

TABLE 1.

Comparison of in vitro and in silico CK2 phosphorylation site predictions

The number of in vitro CK2 phosphorylation sites in each initiation factor substrate was estimated by the incorporation of [32P] into polypeptide as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Results obtained in vitro are expressed as the average of three experiments ± S.D.

Factor No. of CK2 phosphorylation sites
In vitro In silico predictions
Scansitea NetPhosKb KinasePhosc
rWheIF2α 1.0 ± 0.1 1 4 3 4 1 2
rAteIF2α 1.8 ± 0.2 3 5 4 6 1 5
rWheIF2β 0.8 ± 0.1 1 2 0 2 1 1
rAteIF2β 0.9 ± 0.1 0 2 1 1 1 2
rWheIF3c 7.4 ± 0.6 8 15 8 11 5 15
rAteIF3c NDd 7 12 8 9 2 8
rWheIF4B 1.8 ± 0.1 2 5 2 3 2 7
rAteIF4B1 5.8 ± 0.1 0 6 4 5 0 5
rAteIF4B2 5.8 ± 0.5 0 9 2 3 1 12
rWheIF5 3.1 ± 0.1 0 3 1 3 1 3
rAteIF5 3.2 ± 0.2 0 4 4 6 4 6
rWhHD2B ND 12 13 12 12 7 14
rAtHD2B 5.8 ± 0.4 9 11 7 7 4 9
<0.5e <0.59e >0.60e >0.57e 100%e 95%e

a ScanSite version 2.0 is available on line.

b NetPhosK version 1.0 is available on line.

c KinasePhos is available on line.

d ND means not determined.

e Phosphorylation sites were predicted using two cutoff values for each program.