Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2009 Jun 7;85(9):561–567. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.012

Table 2.

Values for HR, LF, HF, and LF/HF during Four Periods in KC and IC Conditions1

KC (n = 13) IC (n = 10) Comparison KC vs. IC 3


M SD M SD Z df p-value
HR (beats/min)
 BL 146.46 9.36 152.07 12.83 2.20 1 (19) < .05
 HW 152.10 11.65 153.71 11.91 0.11 1 (18) > .05
 HS 158.64 13.58 164.87 14.48 2.43 1 (16) < .05
 RC 146.42 14.17 153.86 14.12 1.44 1 (18) > .05
 Comparison across 4 periods 2 F (3, 12) = 4.43, p < .05 F (3, 9) = 12.16, p < .001
LF (ms2)
 BL 6.30 10.38 2.83 2.65 2.59 1 (19) < .01
 HW 19.44 54.37 6.84 6.38 0.60 1 (18) > .05
 HS 30.05 41.26 17.62 24.55 3.43 1 (17) < .001
 RC 15.16 29.85 3.13 2.46 1.46 1 (18) > .05
Comparison across 4 periods 2 F (3, 10) = 4.06, p < .05 F (3, 9) = 4.75, p < .01
HF (ms2)
 BL 2.05 3.77 1.38 3.10 2.00 1 (19) < .05
 HW 22.91 70.57 5.96 8.62 1.12 1 (18) > .05
 HS 48.50 71.04 23.52 35.96 1.24 1 (17) > .05
 RC 19.89 54.42 0.50 0.52 1.71 1 (18) > .05
Comparison across 4 periods 2 F (3, 10) = 6.18, p < .01 F (3, 9) = 10 .88, p < .001
LF/HF ratio
 BL 6.32 4.56 11.18 9.00 0.77 1 (20) > .05
 HW 5.12 5.71 4.23 4.90 0.95 1 (18) > .05
 HS 3.89 6.69 1.75 1.84 0.07 1 (17) > .05
 RC 7.61 5.26 10.60 8.63 3.59 1 (18) < .001
 Comparison across 4 periods 2 F (3, 10) = 6.07, p < .01 F (3, 9) = 11.63, p < .001
1

HR = arithmetic mean, LF, HF, L/HF = geometric means;

2

Comparison across 4 periods: Repeated measures analysis of variance was used;

3

Comparison KC vs. IC: Generalized Estimating Equations model was used; KC = Kangaroo Care condition; IC = Incubator care condition; BL = Baseline; HW = Heel Warming; HS = Heel Stick; RC = Recovery; LF = low frequency power; HF = high frequency power; LF/HF = Low/High frequency power ratio.

This study was supported by AWHONN to the first author and National Institute of Nursing Research, NIH (RO3NR08587-01) to the third author.