Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2009 Sep;24(3):563–573. doi: 10.1037/a0015511

Table 4.

Results of comparing growth curve models: -2LL (df).

Variable and modela Verbal Spatial Memory Speed
Complexity with Data
1: No group differences 4025 (669) 4344 (678) 4623 (665) 4463 (683)
2: Group differences in I 4021 (667) 4343 (676) 4622 (663) 4460 (681)
3: Group differences in I & P 4017 (665) 4343 (674) 4618 (661) 4460 (679)
4: Group differences in I & P & S1 4015 (663) 4341 (672) 4614 (659) 4460 (677)
5: Group differences in I & P & S2 4014 (663) 4343 (672) 4614 (659) 4460 (677)
6: Group differences in I & P & S1 & S2 4013 (661) 4341 (670) 4614 (657) 4459 (675)
Complexity with People
1: No group differences 4025 (669) 4344 (678) 4623 (665) 4463 (683)
2: Group differences in I 4025 (667) 4337 (676)b 4619 (663) 4456 (681)b
3: Group differences in I & P 4020 (665) 4331 (674)c 4618 (661) 4455 (679)
4: Group differences in I & P & S1 4013 (663)d 4331 (672) 4615 (659) 4452 (677)
5: Group differences in I & P & S2 4018 (663) 4324 (672)d 4615 (659) 4454 (677)
6: Group differences in I & P & S1 & S2 4010 (661) 4324 (670) 4612 (657) 4452 (675)
a

Model fitting is described in the text: I = Intercept, P = Practice, S1 = Slope 1, S2 = Slope 2

b

Model fit is significantly different from model 1 at p < .05.

c

Model fit is significantly different from model 2 at p < .05.

d

Model fit is significantly different from model 3 at p < .05.

Note: -2LL is the log likelihood indicator of model fit. Education was included as a covariate in all models.