Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: Learn Behav. 2009 Aug;37(3):254–268. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.3.254

Table 4. Design summary of Experiment 4.

Group Conditioning Extinction Surrogate Training Test Pred ECH
NoExt 5 AX → S (8) Short Ctx (20 min) S → US (4) X cr
NoExt 125 AX → S (8) Short Ctx (20 min) S → US (4) X CR
ExtA+C 5 AX → S (8) A- (200) in long ctx (8 h) S → US (4) X CR
ExtA+C 125 AX → S (8) A- (200) in long ctx (8 h) S → US (4) X CR
ExtC 5 AX → S (8) Long Ctx (8 h) S → US (4) X cr
ExtC 125 AX → S (8) Long Ctx (8 h) S → US (4) X cr

Note: NoExt = No extinction treatment, ExtA+C = Extinction of A and the context, ExtC = Extinction of the context, 5 and 125 = 5-s and 125-s CS duration, A (tone) = overshadowing stimulus, X (clicks) = target cue, S (white noise) = surrogate outcome, US = footshock. Numbers in parentheses refer to the number of each trial type or duration of context exposure. Pred ECH = predictions of the extended comparator hypothesis (Denniston et al., 2001). CR and cr denote strong and weak stimulus control, respectively.