Table 2.
Descriptive Statistics and Correlations for Degree Measures from 2004 and 2008
| Skewness | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Degree Measures | N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Dev. | Statistic | Std. Error |
| Standard Degree | 159 | 0 | 450 | 74.70 | 68.35 | 2.56 | 0.192 |
| Recruit Degree | 159 | 0 | 10000 | 80.70 | 791.94 | 12.59 | 0.192 |
| Email Degree | 159 | 0 | 1000 | 19.97 | 80.08 | 11.77 | 0.192 |
| Buddylist Degree | 159 | 0 | 200 | 66.30 | 44.58 | 1.13 | 0.192 |
| Weighted Degree | 159 | 2.59 | 3547 | 49.13 | 281.34 | 12.33 | 0.192 |
| Skewness | |||||||
| 2008 Degree Measures | N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Dev. | Statistic | Std. Error |
| Standard Degree | 378 | 3 | 1000 | 103.91 | 104.99 | 3.68 | 0.125 |
| Cell Phone Degree | 377 | 0 | 300 | 58.66 | 47.82 | 2.16 | 0.126 |
| Internet Degree | 377 | 0 | 900 | 128.67 | 141.61 | 1.75 | 0.126 |
| DIM Degree | 377 | 0 | 150 | 11.99 | 14.69 | 4.14 | 0.126 |
| Weighted Degree | 377 | 1.33 | 198.1 | 29.47 | 25.78 | 2.59 | 0.126 |
| 2004 Degree Correlations |
2008 Degree Correlations | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruit | Buddylist | Weighted | Cell Phone | Internet | DIM | Weighted | |||
| Standard | −0.01 | 0.06 | 0.50** | 0.03 | Standard | 0.42** | 0.32** | 0.26** | 0.90** |
| Recruit | 0.98** | 0.25** | 0.99** | Cell Phone | 0.46** | 0.33** | 0.48** | ||
| 0.29** | 0.98** | Internet | 0.16** | 0.32** | |||||
| Buddylist | 0.28 | DIM | 0.66** | ||||||
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)