Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sociol Methodol. 2009 Aug 1;39(1):73–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01216.x

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics and Correlations for Degree Measures from 2004 and 2008

Skewness
2004 Degree Measures N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Dev. Statistic Std. Error
Standard Degree 159 0 450 74.70 68.35 2.56 0.192
Recruit Degree 159 0 10000 80.70 791.94 12.59 0.192
Email Degree 159 0 1000 19.97 80.08 11.77 0.192
Buddylist Degree 159 0 200 66.30 44.58 1.13 0.192
Weighted Degree 159 2.59 3547 49.13 281.34 12.33 0.192

Skewness
2008 Degree Measures N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Dev. Statistic Std. Error

Standard Degree 378 3 1000 103.91 104.99 3.68 0.125
Cell Phone Degree 377 0 300 58.66 47.82 2.16 0.126
Internet Degree 377 0 900 128.67 141.61 1.75 0.126
DIM Degree 377 0 150 11.99 14.69 4.14 0.126
Weighted Degree 377 1.33 198.1 29.47 25.78 2.59 0.126
2004 Degree
Correlations
2008 Degree Correlations


Recruit Email Buddylist Weighted Cell Phone Internet DIM Weighted
Standard −0.01 0.06 0.50** 0.03 Standard 0.42** 0.32** 0.26** 0.90**
Recruit 0.98** 0.25** 0.99** Cell Phone 0.46** 0.33** 0.48**
Email 0.29** 0.98** Internet 0.16** 0.32**
Buddylist 0.28 DIM 0.66**


**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)