Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2008 Oct;12(5):451–455. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.07.001

Table 1.

Baseline patient demographic and clinical characteristics

Characteristic N = 102 Patients

Gender: Female N( %) 53 (52)

Race/ethnicity, N(%)
    White 70 (69)
    African American 6 (6)
    Hispanic or Latino 11 (11)
    Other 4 (4)
    Unknown/not reported 11 (11)

Age at onset of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), in months* N (%)
    0 to <1 81 (79)
    1 to <6 21 (21)

Age at surgery, in months N (%)
    12 - <18 34 (33)
    18 -<24 31 (30)
    24 - <36 25 (25)
    36 - <48 12 (12)
    Mean (range) 23 (12–47)

Previous treatment with topical antibiotics N (%)
    Yes (at least one eye) 53 (52)
    No (neither eye) 35 (34)
    Not known 14 (14)

Previous treatment with nasolacrimal duct (NLD) massage N (%)
    Yes (at least one eye) 47 (46)
    No (neither eye) 37 (36)
    Not known 18 (18)

Laterality of NLDO treated with balloon (by patient) N (%)
    Unilateral 53 (52)
    Bilateral 49 (48)

Clinical signs N=151 eyes

Increased tear lake present N (%) 141 (93)

Epiphora present N (%) 97 (64)

Mucous discharge present N (%) 75 (50)

Number of clinical signs of NLDO N (%)
    1 45 (30)
    2 50 (33)
    3 56 (37)

Dye disappearance test (DDT) results at enrollment N (%)
    Normal** 4 (3)
    Indeterminate 23 (15)
    Abnormal 124 (82)

Type of obstruction N (%)
    Simple 92 (61)
    Complex 59 (39)

Inferior turbinate infracture performed N (%)
    Yes 24 (16)
    No 127 (84)
*

Bilateral patients were classified according to age at onset in first eye.

**

Clinical signs in patients with normal dye disappearance test results included increased tear lake as the only sign in 2 patients, epiphora and increased tear lake in 1 patient, and all 3 signs in 1 patient.