Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2009;71(3):558–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00619.x

Table 3.

Selected Results of Multilevel Models Predicting Parenting Stress by Relationship Transitions (N =4,176 )

Model 1a Model 2a Model 3a Model 1b Model 2b Model 3b

B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE

Coresiding at birth
  Exit marriage .26 .15 .20 .16 .001 .15 −.17 .17 −.08 .17 −.13 .17
  Exit cohabitation .30** .10 .20* .10 .07 .10 −.12 .11 −.08 .11 −.06 .11
  Two transitionsa .54** .19 .43* .19 .29 .19 .11 .21 .15 .20 .16 .20
  Stably coreside --- --- --- --- --- --- −.42*** .09 −.28** .09 −.13 .09
Living alone at birth
  Enter coresidence with
 biological father
.13 .10 −.01 .10 −.07 .10 −.29** .10 −.29** .10 −.20 .11
  Enter coresidence with
 social father
.30* .10 .14 .13 .02 .13 −.12 .12 −.14 .12 −.11 .12
  Stably live alone .42*** .09 .28** .09 .13 .09 --- --- --- --- --- ---

Note: Unstandardized coefficients presented. Models control for maternal age, race, immigrant status, child gender, low birth weight, parity, number of children living in household at each wave, and mothers who make transitions in more than one observation period (omitted from table). Models 2a and 2b include pretransition resources. Models 3a and 3b include pretransition and posttransition resources.

a

Mothers who exit coresidence with the biological father and then enter coresidence with a social father.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.