Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;113(4):817–823. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819b33ac

TABLE 4.

Effect of interpregnancy BMI change on the risk of cesarean delivery during the subsequent pregnancy among women with gestational diabetes and vaginal delivery in their baseline pregnancy

Number of Deliveries Odds Ratios of Cesarean Delivery at Subsequent Birth
BMI Change (kg/m2)1 Total Vaginal (%) Cesarean (%) OR2 95% CI Adjusted OR3 95% CI
Less than -1 386 95.6 4.4 0.86 0.48-1.54 0.55 0.27-1.15
-1 to 0.9 726 94.9 5.1 1.0 1.0
1 to 1.9 287 93.4 6.6 1.32 0.75-2.34 1.35 0.74-2.46
2 to 2.9 222 92.8 7.2 1.45 0.79-2.65 1.28 0.67-2.43
Greater than 3 526 89.7 10.3 2.13 1.38-3.29 1.74 1.04-2.91
1

Missing BMI data for 434 (17%) women

2

Unadjusted

3

Adjusted for mother’s age, mother’s education, mother’s race/ethnicity, mother’s smoking during the subsequent pregnancy, pre-pregnancy weight of the baseline pregnancy, BMI gain during the baseline and subsequent pregnancy, interbirth interval, year of birth (subsequent pregnancy)