Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Explor Econ Hist. 2009 Oct 1;46(4):450–463. doi: 10.1016/j.eeh.2009.05.001

Table 7.

Coefficients of Mobility Sorted by Type of Birthplace

Birthplace

Large City Small City High Malaria Rural Low Malaria Rural Foreign
111 1.7964 ** 211 311 411 511 1.9026 ***
112 212 312 412 512 1.0193
113 213 313 413 513
114 1.0364 214 314 414 1.0106 514 2.9922 ***

121 221 321 421 521
122 1.6488 222 1.4335 * 322 422 1.7306 ** 522 2.6564 ***
123 223 323 423 523
124 224 0.7380 324 424 1.1024 524 1.4083

131 231 331 0.9883 431 531 2.2441 **
132 232 332 0.7060 432 0.7648 532 1.2373
133 233 333 1.2293 *** 433 0.7060 *** 533 1.6062 **
134 234 334 0.9927 434 0.9408 534 0.9572

141 1.4953 241 1.5468 341 0.9879 441 1.2786 * 541 2.1323 ***
142 242 1.6339 ** 342 442 1.1338 542 0.9193
143 0.7492 243 1.5950 343 0.8678 443 1.0234 543 0.9402
144 1.0603 244 1.4263 ** 344 0.8934 444 Omitted 544 1.1876 ***

Notes: Out of 3,732 samples employed in the previous analyses, we used 3,684 veterans here by limiting our analysis to the mobility groups with 5 samples or more. The groups with blank above were dropped because of their sample sizes are less than 5. On the other hand, we denoted the groups without observation by hyphens (—). ‘Omitted’ group is the reference group. Values of the hazard ratios over 1.5000 have been bolded. Besides mobility dummies, we controlled for birth year and other explanatory variables listed in Table 5. Single asterisk denotes statistical significance at the 90% level of confidence, double 95%, triple 99%.