Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: Complement Health Pract Rev. 2006 Apr 1;11(2):95–106. doi: 10.1177/1533210106292461

TABLE 4.

Logistic Regression Resultsa (Adjusted Odds Ratio [95% CI]) for Associations Between CAM for General Use and Diabetes Care in the Past Year and Participation in Selected Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors in the Past Week (N) in the ELDER Study

CAM for General Use
CAM for Diabetes Care
Self-Management behaviorb Consumedc Therapies Practitioners Consumedc Therapies Practitioners
Foot inspection
  OR 1.6 1.5 1.4 2.4** 1.4 2.1
  95% CI 0.9, 2.6 0.7, 3.2 0.6, 2.9 1.4, 4.2 0.4, 5.0 0.3, 17.3
  Compliant participantsd 470 470 468 470 469
  ne 609 609 607 609 608 607
Healthful eating plan
  OR 1.8* 2.0* 1.2 1.8** 2.9* 9.6**
  95% CI 1.1, 3.1 1.1, 3.5 0.7, 2.3 1.2, 2.7 1.0, 8.2 1.9, 48.3
  Compliant participantsd 202 202 202 202 202 202
  ne 607 607 605 607 606 605
Medication adherence
  OR 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.9 1.7 0.7
  95% CI 0.2, 1.5 0.4, 3.5 0.3, 2.1 0.4, 1.8 0.2, 13.7 0.1, 6.4
  Compliant participantsd 569 569 567 569 568
  ne 617 617 615 617 616 615

Note. CAM = complementary and alternative medicine; ELDER = Evaluating Long-term Diabetes Self-management among Elder Rural Adults; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for ethnicity, gender, education, living arrangements, poverty status, self-rated health, Short Form–12 physical and mental component score, number of chronic conditions, and number of prescription medications.

b

For the multivariate analysis, all self-management behavior outcomes were dichotomized. The outcomes of foot inspection and healthful eating plan were dichotomized as 0 days versus >0 days. Compliance with recommended medication was dichotomized as <7 days versus 7 days.

c

Consumed CAM includes food home remedy, other home remedy, vitamins/minerals, herbs, and popular manufactured products.

d

Total number of participants compliant with the self-management behavior

e

Total number of participants included in each model.

*

.01 < p ≤ .05

**

.001 <p ≤ .01

***

p ≤ .001.