Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 25;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-5-14

Table 1.

Distribution of the seven required graphic health warnings in purchased packs and street-collected packs

Theme of the graphic warning A priori assessment of the images Purchased packs (collected October 2008) Street-collected packs* (collected November 2008 to January 2009)
Observed (N) Percentage Odds** Observed (N) Percentage Odds**
Corpse with toe-tag Least disturbing 43 25.6% Reference category 215 17.8% Reference category
Pregnant woman & infant Moderately disturbing 25 14.9% 0.58
(0.36, 0.95)
169 14.0% 0.79
(0.64, 0.96)
Damaged heart Moderately disturbing 36 21.4% 0.84
(0.54, 1.3)
158 13.1% 0.73
(0.6, 0.9)
Damaged lungs Moderately disturbing 17 10.1% 0.40
(0.23, 0.69)
174 14.4% 0.81
(0.66, 0.99)
Gangrenous toes Most disturbing 17 10.1% 0.40
(0.23, 0.69)
156 12.9% 0.73
(0.59, 0.89)
Eye (blindness) Most disturbing 18 10.7% 0.42
(0.24, 0.73)
169 14.0% 0.79
(0.64, 0.96)
Diseased mouth/cancer Most disturbing 12 7.1% 0.28
(0.15, 0.53)
167 13.8% 0.78
(0.63, 0.95)

Total 168 1208

* For those packs that had the seven required GHWs (ie, excluding NZ packs with text-only warnings (n = 8), overseas made packs (n = 42), and also NZ packs showing the next batch of seven GHWs that began to appear in January 2009 (n = 52).

** This column presents the odds of being the specified image rather than the least disturbing image (ie, odds < 1 indicate that the image was less common than the "corpse with toe-tag" image).