Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Apr 28;53(17):1475–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.007

Table 3.

Overview of the diagnostic accuracy of individual tissue criteria as assessed in controlled trials.

Early myocardial gadolinium enhancement Validation Sens Spec Acc PPV NPV
Friedrich et al., Circulation 1998 (9) Clinical 84% 89% 86% 89% 84%
Laissy et al., Chest 2002 (11) Clinical 85% 100% 89% 100% 70%
Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 (13) Clinical 80% 68% 74% 74% 75%
Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008 (34) Histology 63% 86% 72% 86% 63%

Pooled data (n=194) 74% 83% 78% 86% 70%
T2 Validation Sens Spec Acc PPV NPV

Rieker et al., RoFo 2002 (36) Clinical 100% 50% 76% 69% 100%
Laissy et al., Chest 2002 (11) Clinical 45% 100% 59% 100% 39%
Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 (13) Clinical 84% 74% 79% 78% 81%
Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008 (34) Histology 67% 69% 67% 74% 60%

Pooled data (n=178) 70% 71% 70% 77% 63%
Late enhancement Validation Sens Spec Acc PPV NPV

Rieker et al., RoFo 2002 (36) Clinical 45% 60% 52% 56% 50%
Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005(18) Clinical 44% 100% 71% 78% 62%
Mahrholdt et al., Circulation 2006 (40) Histology 95% 96% 96% 99% 81%
Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008 (34) Histology 27% 80% 49% 65% 44%
Yilmaz et al., Heart 2008 (43) Histology 35% 83% 51% 81% 38%

Pooled data (n=336) 59% 86% 68% 89% 53%

Sens: Sensitivity; Spec: Specificity; Acc: Accuracy; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value