Table 4.
Overview of the diagnostic accuracy of several combinations of tissue criteria.
| T2+LGE | Validation | Sens | Spec | Acc | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 (13) | Clinical | 40% | 100% | 69% | 100% | 61% |
| Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008 (34) | Histology | 17% | 91% | 48% | 73% | 44% |
| Pooled data (n=130) | 25% | 95% | 56% | 86% | 50% | |
| T2 and/or LGE | Validation | Sens | Spec | Acc | PPV | NPV |
| Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 (13) | Clinical | 88% | 74% | 81% | 100% | 85% |
| Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008 (34) | Histology | 50% | 57% | 52% | 80% | 25% |
| Pooled data (n=130) | 60% | 66% | 62% | 79% | 43% | |
| Any one of three | Validation | Sens | Spec | Acc | PPV | NPV |
| Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 (13) | Clinical | 100% | 48% | 75% | 68% | 100% |
| Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008(42) | Histology | 81% | 49% | 67% | 68% | 65% |
| Pooled data (n=130) | 88% | 48% | 70% | 68% | 76% | |
| Any two of three | Validation | Sens | Spec | Acc | PPV | NPV |
| Abdel-Aty et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 (13) | Clinical | 76% | 96% | 85% | 95% | 79% |
| Gutberlet et al., Radiology 2008 (34) | Histology | 63% | 89% | 73% | 88% | 63% |
| Pooled data (n=130) | 67% | 91% | 78% | 91% | 69% |
Sens: Sensitivity; Spec: Specificity; Acc: Accuracy; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value