Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Soc Policy. 2009 Apr–Jun;21(2):130–143. doi: 10.1080/08959420902728751

Table 1.

Summary Statistics (N=14,088)

Total
Sample
For-Profit Nonprofit
For-Profit Agency 31%
Mean length of use (in days) 93.87 99.68 91.22
Length of use less than 30 days 47% 42%** 50%
Length of use greater than 99 days 17% 22%** 15%
Discharged: Death 4% 5% 4%
Discharged: Institution 17% 18% 17%
Discharged: Goals met 68% 64%* 69%
Discharged: Other 11% 13% 10%
Person-level control variables
Medicare 66% 63% 68%
Medicaid 10% 9% 11%
Private Insurance 17% 21%* 16%
Other payer 6% 8% 5%
Female 62% 62% 63%
Married 38% 36% 39%
Marital status missing 12% 16%** 10%
African American 10% 12% 9%
White 69% 65%* 71%
Other race 4% 4% 4%
Race missing 17% 20% 16%
Hispanic 5% 6% 4%
Lives in Metropolitan Statistical Area 86% 88% 84%
Region: West 16% 20% 14%
Region: South 27% 41%** 21%
Region: Midwest 21% 17% 23%
Region: Northeast 36% 22%** 42%
Age less than 65 30% 32% 29%
Age 65-74 22% 21% 23%
Age 75-84 31% 28%* 32%
Age 85+ 17% 19% 16%
Lives alone 27% 27% 26%
Lives in an institution 7% 9%** 6%
Referral source: self/family 3% 4% 3%
Referral source: hospital 47% 35%** 53%
Referral source: nursing home 2% 2% 3%
Referral source: Doctor 35% 43%** 31%
Referral source: other 12% 16%** 10%
Has primary caregiver 79% 76%* 81%
Vision difficulty 17% 19% 17%
Hearing difficulty 16% 16% 16%
Charlson score = 0 46% 50%** 45%
Charlson score = 1 28% 26% 28%
Charlson score = 2 18% 17% 18%
Charlson score = 3 5% 4% 5%
Charlson score = 4+ 4% 3%* 4%
Agency-level control variables
Group-owned agency 45% 60%** 38%
Group-owned missing 4% 1%** 5%
Hospital-based agency 41% 18%** 51%
Hospital-based missing 3% 1%** 4%
Time
1994 wave 18% 16% 19%
1996 wave 26% 27% 26%
1998 wave 29% 36%* 25%
2000 wave 27% 22%* 29%

Notes: Asterisks identify a statistically significant difference between for-profit and nonprofit agencies.

**

p<.01

*

p< 0.05