Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Soc Policy. 2009 Apr–Jun;21(2):130–143. doi: 10.1080/08959420902728751

Table 2.

Association between ownership status and home health care discharge: All patients

Dependent variable Absolute percentage
point change for
patients in for-profit
agencies vs. nonprofit
agencies
Absolute percentage
point change after the
IPS for patients in for-
profit agencies vs.
nonprofit agencies
N
Length of use < 30 days (vs. ≥30 days) −6.5**
(0.006)
−8.1*
(0.037)
14,088
Length of use > 99 days (vs. ≤99 days) 3.4
(0.064)
−4.3
(0.234)
14,088
Discharged: death (vs. goals met) −0.2
(0.677)
−1.5
(0.581)
9,487
Discharged: institution (vs. goals met) 3.4
(0.057)
−5.0
(0.098)
11,137
Discharged: other (vs. goals met) 2.3
(0.142)
−3.6
(0.254)
10,496

Notes: Estimates in Column 1 are the main effects from a multivariate probit model and estimates from column 2 are the interaction terms (for-profit * Interim Payment System) from a linear probability model. The regressions adjust for all the variables in Table 1. Marginal probability effects are presented and can be interpreted as the percentage point change in the dependent variable. P-values are presented in parentheses. The discharge status models include dummy variables controlling for length of use.

**

p<.01

*

p< 0.05