Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioconjug Chem. 2006 Nov–Dec;17(6):1545–1550. doi: 10.1021/bc060154p

Table 3.

Competitive Binding of Linked NDP-α-MSH and MSH(4) Ligands to hMC4R

compound monomer/dimer linkera IC50 nb fold increase
NDP-α-MSH none 5.6 ± 0.2 nM 3
9 D Ph 3.5 ± 2.2 nM 4 1.4
12 M Ph 5.0 ± 1.2 nM 4
10 D BP 5.6 ± 3.5 nM 5 0.9
13 M BP 5.2 ± 5.2 nM 5
11 D TP 8.4 ± 2.9 nM 5 2.0
14 M TP 16.5 ± 14.7 nM 5
32 D PN 3.7 ± 0.9 nM 5 1.1
33 M PN 3.9 ± 1.2 nM 4
MSH(4) none 2.1 ± 0.8 μM 3
37 D Ph 0.1 ± 0.05 μM 4 22.9
41 M Ph 1.8 ± 0.2 μM 4
38 D BP 0.6 ± 0.2 μM 4 4.8
42 M BP 2.8 ± 1.1 μM 4
39 D TP 2.6 ± 1.0 μM 4 1.9
43 M TP 5.0 ± 3.6 μM 5
40 D PN 0.5 ± 0.2 μM 4 3.2
44 M PN 1.5 ± 0.7 μM 4
a

Ph = phenyl linker 1; BP = biphenyl linker 2; TP = terphenyl linker 3; and PN = phenylnaphthyl linker 4.

b

The IC50 value given is the average of n independent binding experiments, each done in quadruplicate.