Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 21;14(35):5442–5447. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5442

Table 1.

Comparisons between participants with and without erosive esophagitis (n = 5037)

With erosive esophagitis (n = 1679) Without erosive esophagitis (n = 3358) P
Age (yr, mean ± SD) 45.2 ± 9.3 45.2 ± 9.7 0.873
Gender (M/F, %) 86/14 59/41 < 0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 24.8 ± 2.9 23.5 ± 3.0 < 0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 86.8 ± 8.7 81.5 ± 9.8 < 0.001
Current smoking 724 (43%) 786 (23%) < 0.001
Alcohol use (≥ 3-4/wk) 360 (21%) 387 (12%) < 0.001
Metabolic syndrome 352 (21%) 433 (13%) < 0.001
Hiatal hernia 38 (2.2%) 24 (0.7%) < 0.001
Reflux symptoms1 194 (12%) 265 (8.0%) < 0.001
Systolic BP (mmHg) 118.3 ± 12.7 114.8 ± 13.5 < 0.001
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 77.7 ± 8.8 74.8 ± 9.5 < 0.001
Fatty liver on abdominal USG 809 (48%) 1014 30%) < 0.001
Fasting plasma glucose 98.4 ± 20.5 95.2 ± 17.2 < 0.001
HbAlc 5.6 ± 0.7 5.5 ± 0.6 0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL, mean ± SD) 158.9 ± 110.4 123.5 ± 78.6 < 0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL) (mean ± SD) 54.1 ± 12.0 56.4 ± 12.8 < 0.001
HOMA2 2.41 ± 1.10 2.18 ± 0.89 < 0.001
H pylori positive 211/555 (38%) 498/922 (54%) < 0.001
Education (college and higher) 894/1184 (75%) 1639/2391 (69%) < 0.001
1

Reflux symptoms: Weekly heartburn and/or acid regurgitation;

2

HOMA: Homeostasis model assessment estimates steady state beta cell function and insulin sensitivity.