Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 21;14(35):5442–5447. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5442

Table 4.

Associations of grade of erosive esophagitis, according to LA classification, with risk factors for erosive esophagitis n (%)

Control (n = 3358) A (n = 1326) B (n = 328) C or D (n = 25) P for linear trend
Age (yr, mean ± SD) 45.2 ± 9.7 44.8 ± 9.7 46.4 ± 9.3 49.9 ± 10.7 0.094
Males 1991 (59) 1122 (85) 300 (92) 22 (88) < 0.001
Current smoking 786 (23) 554 (42) 162 (49) 8 (32) < 0.001
Alcohol use (≥ 3-4/wk) 387 (12) 251 (19) 101 (31) 8 (32) < 0.001
Hiatal hernia 24 (0.2) 32 (2) 3 (1) 3 (12) < 0.001
Reflux symptoms1 265 (8.0) 141 (11) 50 (15) 3 (12) < 0.001
Metabolic syndrome 433 (13) 255 (19) 87 (27) 10 (40) 0.001
Fatty liver on Abdominal USG 1014 (30) 625 (47) 166 (51) 18 (72) < 0.001
HOMA2 (mean ± SD) 2.18 ± 0.89 2.39 ± 1.10 2.50 ± 1.10 2.70 ± 1.12 0.007
1

Reflux symptoms: Weekly heartburn and/or acid regurgitation;

2

HOMA: Homeostasis model assessment estimates steady state beta cell function and insulin sensitivity.