Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2009 Mar 1;23(3):402–424. doi: 10.1080/02687030802291339

Table 2.

Pre- and post-treatment scores for all administered tests/tasks

Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4
pre-tx post-tx pre-tx post-tx pre-tx post-tx pre-tx post-tx
TESTS AND TASKS
WITH
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Western Aphasia Battery (AQ) 76.4 82.5 78.5 86.4 73.8 81.2 70.6 82.3
  Information 7 9 8 9 9 9 8 9
  Fluency 5 6 4 6 8 9 7 8
  Comprehension 8.6 8.15 9.35 9.9 8.1 8.9 7.7 9.85
  Repetition 9.4 9.8 9.6 9.5 3.9 6.2 4.9 6.4
  Naming 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.8 7.9 7.5 7.7 7.9
Northwestern Verb Productin Battery
  Sentence production without verb provided*(N = 22) 22
(54.5%)
19
(86.4%)
13
(59.1%)
18
(81.8%)
16
(72.7%)
19
(86.4%)
22
(31.8%)
22
(63.6%)
TESTS AND TASKS TO
EVALUTE
PRE-POST CHANGES
Boston Naming Test
  (N = 60)
43
(71.7%)
50
(83%)
49
(81.7%)
54
(90%)
27
(45%)
33
(55%)
27
(45%)
41
(68.3)
NVPB
(Single verbs) (N = 22)
16
(72.7%)
19
(86.4%)
16
(72.7%)
16
(72.7%)
18
(81.8%)
20
(90.9)
11
(50.0%)
13
(59.1%)

tx: treatment

*

The Northwestern Verb Production Battery protocol requires showing and reading aloud the verbs for each sentence to be produced. However, the verbs were not seen or heard by the participants in this study during administration of the test in order to evaluate better noun and verb retrieval changes