Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jan 17;5(4):565–572. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.018

Table 1. Effect of shock vector and can position on predicted DFTs and myocardial voltage gradients using standard, two-coil transvenous electrode.

Joules indicate predicted necessary field energy to elevate 95% of myocardial elements to a voltage gradient of 5V/cm or greater.

Electrode configuration Joules % myocardium >30V/cm
RIC → RV + SVC 93.2 18.4
RIC + SVC → RV 14.3 30.3
RIC + RV → SVC 22.9 32.2
LIC → RV + SVC 15.1 4.9
LIC + SVC → RV *** 8.3 18.3
LIC + RV → SVC 40.3 44.4
RAC + RV → SVC 10.8 19.7
RAC → RV + SVC 13.4 4.0
RAC + SVC → RV 11.9 28.6
LAC + RV → SVC 10.0 27.1
LAC + RV → SVC 7.5 14.3
LAC → RV + SVC 11.0 3.6

Can Position Key

LIC: Left infraclavicular

RIC: Right infraclavicular

LAC: Left abdominal

RAC: Right abdominal

Electrode Type Key

RV: 5cm right ventricular electrode

SVC: 8 cm superior vena cava electrode

***

Standard configuration