Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2009 Feb 1;101(1):219. doi: 10.1037/a0013246

Table 6.

Decomposition of Effects of School Climate on Response Strategies

Direct intervention
Tell school adult
Tell friend, not adult
Ignore
Direct
effect
Indirect
effect
Total
effect
Direct
effect
Indirect
effect
Total
effect
Direct
effect
Indirect
effect
Total
effect
Direct
effect
Indirect
effect
Total
effect
Variable r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE r SE
Democratic authority .183*** .066 .003 .004 .186*** .066 .248*** .075 .016* .014 .264*** .077 .060 .074 −.015* .014 .045 .075 −.142** .064 −.016* .012 −.157*** .065
School solidarity .074 .050 .006 .006 .080* .050 .062 .056 .035** .013 .097* .057 −.025 .057 −.032*** .012 −.057 .058 .041 .049 −.033** .011 .008 .050
Personal belonging .165*** .038 .005 .005 .171*** .038 .046 .042 .030*** .010 .076* .042 .019 .043 −.027** .010 −.008 .043 −.171*** .037 −.028*** .014 −.199*** .038

Note. Standardized coefficients are reported for all effects. All coefficients and standard errors for the indirect effects were estimated using the MODEL INDIRECT command in Mplus Version 4.2. Mplus implements indirect effects that are the product of the two regression coefficients, that is, a multiplied by b. The delta method was used to calculate standard errors of the indirect effects.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.